Quantum Computing MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By TypeBy ApplicationBy TechnologyBy Deployment ModelBy End User
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Quantum Computing Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Type (Hardware, Software, Services), By Application (Defense, Banking & finance, Chemicals, Healthcare & pharmaceuticals, Energy & power), By Technology (Superconducting, Trapped Ion, Quantum Annealing, Photonic), By Deployment Model (On-Premises, Cloud-Based), By End User (Government & Defense Agencies, Academic & Research Institutes, Commercial Enterprises), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Segment definitions and share of revenue by product, animal, end user and region.

- 01By TypeHardware · Software · Services
- 02By ApplicationDefense · Banking & finance · Chemicals
- 03By TechnologySuperconducting · Trapped Ion · Quantum Annealing
- 04By Deployment ModelOn-Premises · Cloud-Based
- 05By End UserGovernment & Defense Agencies · Academic & Research Institutes · Commercial Enterprises
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
Quantum computing systems process information using qubits that exploit superposition and entanglement to solve certain classes of computational problems faster than classical processors on the same task. The market covers physical quantum processing hardware, the control and programming software layered on top of it, and the consulting, integration and cloud-access services that let an organization run workloads without owning the machine itself. Buyers include government research agencies, national laboratories, universities and large enterprises in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, finance and chemicals that are testing quantum algorithms against optimization, simulation and cryptography problems.
USD 1.45 billion of revenue was recorded in the global quantum computing market in 2025. By 2034 the figure reaches USD 14.55 billion, a compound annual growth rate of 28.98% through the forecast period, along a series that runs USD 0.46 billion in 2020, USD 1.19 billion in 2024, USD 1.9 billion in 2026 and USD 5.95 billion in 2030.
On the type axis, growth rates run from 26.34% for Hardware up to 33.35% for Software. Hardware carries the volume: USD 0.77 billion and 53.1% of revenue in 2025, USD 6.36 billion and 43.7% in 2034. Share moves toward Software and Services and away from Hardware, though no line shrinks in revenue terms.
Cut by application, the largest line is Defense: 31% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 0.45 billion, and 22% at USD 3.2 billion by 2034. Energy & power grows faster at 31.8% against 24.35%, moving from 10.3% of revenue to 12.4% by 2034. Both this axis and the type one divide the same revenue, which is why they are alternative views, not components.
North America is the largest region at 48.3% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 0.7 billion and reaching USD 6.25 billion by 2034. Europe follows at 22.8%, moving from USD 0.33 billion to USD 3.06 billion, and Latin America is the smallest at 2.8%. Share shifts toward Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa over the forecast period, so the regional split repays a close reading.
Coverage extends to five regions, three type lines and five segmentation axes over the full fifteen years. The 2025 total itself is arrived at by triangulating published aggregates against category proxies, not by an independent count, and the splits below are estimated on that same basis, a bound on their precision worth carrying into any use of them.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- A forecast-period rate of 28.98% takes the market from USD 1.45 billion in 2025 to USD 14.55 billion in 2034, against 25.81% recorded over the 2020-2025 historical period.
- The largest line by type is Hardware, worth USD 0.77 billion and 53.1% of revenue in 2025, rising to USD 6.36 billion and 43.7% by 2034.
- At 33.35%, Software grows faster than any other type line, moving from USD 0.37 billion and 25.5% of revenue in 2025 to USD 5 billion and 34.4% in 2034.
- The bull case puts 2034 revenue at USD 17.31 billion and the bear case at USD 11.79 billion, either side of the USD 14.55 billion base case, each with its own stated assumption in the full report.
- 48.3% of 2025 revenue is generated in North America, worth USD 0.7 billion and rising to USD 6.25 billion by 2034; Latin America is smallest at 2.8%.
- Within North America, the United States is the worked country example, at USD 0.62 billion in 2025; 88.6% of regional revenue in the base year, and USD 5.31 billion by 2034.
- Fifteen years are reported, 2020 to 2034 with 2025 as the base: revenue, share and growth rate per line, per axis and per region, not as a single blended series.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By By Type
Base year 2025Hardware leads with 53.1% of by type segment revenue.
Share of by type segment revenue, most recent base year.
Three movements define the forecast period in the global quantum computing market: how the type mix changes, where regional weight shifts, and the rate at which the total compounds.
The direction of the market is not in question in any of the three. Each line and each region grows in revenue terms; what separates them is which takes the larger part of the growth.
The type mix tilts toward Software. The widest spread on the type axis is between Software at 33.35% and Hardware at 26.34%. By 2034 the two sit at 34.4% and 43.7% of revenue, against 25.5% and 53.1% in 2025. The revenue figures behind that are USD 0.37 billion to USD 5 billion and USD 0.77 billion to USD 6.36 billion. Both expand; where a supplier sits on the axis still decides whether it tracks the market.
Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa gain regional share. Asia Pacific moves from 22.1% of revenue in 2025 to 28% in 2034, worth USD 0.32 billion rising to USD 4.07 billion; Latin America moves from 2.8% of revenue in 2025 to 3% in 2034, worth USD 0.04 billion rising to USD 0.44 billion; Middle East and Africa moves from 4.1% of revenue in 2025 to 5% in 2034, worth USD 0.06 billion rising to USD 0.73 billion. The remaining regions grow in absolute terms while giving up share: North America at 48.3% moving to 43%, Europe at 22.8% moving to 21%. Revenue added in this market is therefore concentrating geographically instead of spreading evenly, and a participant weighted toward a share-losing region grows more slowly than the market even while its own revenue climbs.
A continuation, not an inflection. The market moves through USD 0.46 billion in 2020, USD 1.19 billion in 2024, USD 1.45 billion in 2025, USD 1.9 billion in 2026, USD 5.95 billion in 2030 and USD 14.55 billion in 2034. There is no discontinuity to time, and 28.98% forecast growth against 25.81% historical means the trend continues and does not turn. For a participant that makes planning a question of capturing a share of steady expansion instead of timing a discontinuity, and it is why the type and regional mixes matter more to a forecast than the headline rate does.
Market Growth Factors
Software adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01Software adds the most incremental growth
At 33.35% against a market rate of 28.98%, Software is the line pulling the average up: USD 0.37 billion to USD 5 billion, and 25.5% of revenue to 34.4%. Nothing else on the axis grows as fast (Hardware manages 26.34%) so the blended 28.98% is carried by this one line instead of shared across them. Exposure to this line, not to the market as a whole, is what determines a supplier's own rate.
- 02The two largest regions hold most of the base
North America is the largest region at USD 0.7 billion in 2025, 48.3% of global revenue, and reaches USD 6.25 billion by 2034 while holding 43%. Europe is next at 22.8% of revenue, USD 0.33 billion in 2025 and USD 3.06 billion in 2034. Between them they hold most of the base and most of the revenue added over the period, so equal-weighting the regions in a plan misstates where the growth is.
- 03A demonstrated trajectory, not a projected turnaround
USD 0.46 billion in 2020, USD 1.19 billion in 2024 and USD 1.45 billion in 2025: 25.81% compound growth before the forecast period even begins. The forecast period then runs at 28.98%, ending 2034 at USD 14.55 billion. Because the growth is already in the record and not only in the projection, the rate is held flat across the forecast instead of ramped, and the risk in the number sits in the mix assumptions, not in whether the market grows at all.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cloud-based access lowering the barrier to running quantum workloads | High | +4.2 | High | High | High |
| 2 | National quantum initiatives and defense funding | High | +3.1 | High | Medium | Medium |
| 3 | Advances in qubit error correction and coherence times | Medium-High | +2.3 | Medium | High | High |
| 4 | Pharmaceutical and chemical R&D use cases reaching pilot scale | Medium-High | +1.9 | Medium | High | High |
| 5 | Financial services adoption for optimization and risk modeling | Medium | +1.35 | Low | Medium | Medium |
| 6 | Others | Low | +0.55 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +13.4 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shortage of specialized quantum engineering talent | Medium | −0.2 | High | Medium | Low |
| 2 | High hardware costs and short coherence times limiting near-term deployment scale | Medium | −0.1 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| Total | −0.3 | |||||
Drivers contribute 13.4 Billion and restraints remove 0.3 Billion, a net 13.1 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Separate the 28.98% into its parts and three show up: an already-large base compounding, the type mix moving toward its faster lines, and regional growth landing unevenly.
Restraining Factors
Downside case: USD 11.79 billion by 2034, against USD 14.55 billion in the base case
Market Restraints
2- 01Downside case: USD 11.79 billion by 2034, against USD 14.55 billion in the base case
The study's downside path assumes bear case assumes government funding renewals slow and error-correction milestones slip, delaying the shift from research-only to commercial workloads by several years, and ends 2034 at USD 11.79 billion against the USD 14.55 billion base case, the same USD 1.45 billion base year, a slower forecast period.
- 02Hardware grows below the market rate
Hardware carries 53.1% of 2025 revenue at USD 0.77 billion but compounds at 26.34% against 28.98% for the market, taking its share to 43.7% by 2034 even as revenue rises to USD 6.36 billion. Because it carries that much of the base, its pace holds the blended rate down more than any faster line lifts it.
Market Opportunities
Upside case: USD 17.31 billion by 2034
Market Opportunities
2- 01Upside case: USD 17.31 billion by 2034
The upside path assumes bull case assumes faster error-correction progress and broader enterprise cloud adoption pull forward two additional years of commercial budget into the forecast window. It ends 2034 at USD 17.31 billion against a USD 14.55 billion base case, off the same USD 1.45 billion base year.
- 02Software is where share changes hands
Share on the type axis moves toward Software, from 25.5% in 2025 to 34.4% in 2034, on 33.35% growth against the market's 28.98% and revenue rising from USD 0.37 billion to USD 5 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds Hardware, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
Concentration on the type axis
Market Challenges
2- 01Concentration on the type axis
One line dominates: Hardware, at 53.1% of revenue in 2025 and 43.7% in 2034, worth USD 0.77 billion and USD 6.36 billion. Anything that changes demand for it changes the headline number; nothing else on the axis carries that weight.
- 02Single-country exposure in North America
North America is worth USD 0.7 billion in 2025 and USD 0.62 billion of that is the United States; 88.6% of the region, reaching USD 5.31 billion in 2034. A regional number that depends this heavily on one country carries that country's specific conditions inside it, which a reader treating the region as diversified would miss.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesThe market is divided by type and by application, technology, deployment model and end user; five axes in all. They are alternative readings of one revenue pool, not parts that sum to it.
There are three lines on the type axis, and all of them grow in revenue between 2025 and 2034. What separates them is share: two gain it, the other gives it up.
By Type · 3 segments
Software Outpaces the Axis While Hardware Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Hardware · 53.1%
- Fastest Software · 33.4%
- Moves most Hardware · -9.4 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | $0.77B | 53.1% | $6.36B | 43.7%-9.4 | 26.3% |
| Software | $0.37B | 25.5% | $5B | 34.4%+8.9 | 33.4% |
| Services | $0.31B | 21.4% | $3.19B | 21.9%+0.5 | 28.8% |
Hardware leads because building and maintaining physical qubit systems demands specialized cryogenics, control electronics and cleanroom fabrication that carry a much higher unit cost than the code layered on top of them. Software is growing fastest as programming frameworks, error-mitigation libraries and hybrid classical-quantum toolchains mature enough for enterprise teams to build repeatable workloads rather than one-off experiments. The order does not change: Hardware is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Application · 5 segments
Scale in Defense and Growth in Energy & power Define the Application Axis
- Largest Defense · 31%
- Fastest Energy & power · 31.8%
- Moves most Defense · -9 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | $0.45B | 31% | $3.20B | 22%-9 | 24.4% |
| Banking & finance | $0.33B | 22.8% | $3.85B | 26.5%+3.7 | 31.4% |
| Chemicals | $0.28B | 19.3% | $2.95B | 20.3%+1 | 29.9% |
| Healthcare & pharmaceuticals | $0.24B | 16.6% | $2.75B | 18.9%+2.3 | 31.1% |
| Energy & power | $0.15B | 10.3% | $1.80B | 12.4%+2.1 | 31.8% |
Defense leads because national security programs were the first to fund dedicated quantum computing budgets and continue to treat cryptographic resilience as a standing procurement priority. Banking and finance is growing fastest as portfolio optimization, fraud detection and derivatives pricing turn out to be problems quantum algorithms can already meaningfully accelerate on today's noisy hardware, drawing commercial budgets in behind the earlier government funding. Leadership changes hands: Banking & finance is the largest line by 2034, not Defense.
By Technology · 4 segments
Superconducting Held the Dominant Share of the Technology Segment in 2025
- Largest Superconducting · 49.7%
- Fastest Photonic · 36.8%
- Moves most Superconducting · -7.1 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superconducting | $0.72B | 49.7% | $6.20B | 42.6%-7.1 | 27% |
| Trapped Ion | $0.35B | 24.1% | $4.35B | 29.9%+5.8 | 32.3% |
| Quantum Annealing | $0.24B | 16.6% | $1.65B | 11.3%-5.3 | 23.9% |
| Photonic | $0.14B | 9.7% | $2.35B | 16.2%+6.5 | 36.8% |
Superconducting qubits lead because they build on established semiconductor fabrication techniques and have attracted the earliest and deepest corporate investment, giving them a head start in qubit count and tooling maturity. Photonic approaches are growing fastest because they operate at room temperature and can reuse existing telecom-grade components, lowering the engineering barrier for new entrants chasing scale. Superconducting remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
By Deployment Model · 2 segments
Cloud-Based Outpaces the Axis While On-Premises Holds the Largest Share
- Largest On-Premises · 60.7%
- Fastest Cloud-Based · 36.2%
- Moves most On-Premises · -23.9 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-Premises | $0.88B | 60.7% | $5.35B | 36.8%-23.9 | 22.2% |
| Cloud-Based | $0.57B | 39.3% | $9.20B | 63.2%+23.9 | 36.2% |
On-premises systems lead today because the earliest quantum computing buyers were government laboratories and large research institutions that wanted direct control over classified or sensitive workloads. Cloud-based access is growing fastest because it lets a much wider set of commercial and academic users experiment with quantum hardware through a subscription instead of committing capital to a machine that may be outdated within a few product cycles. By 2034 the largest line is Cloud-Based and no longer On-Premises, the one axis here where the order actually changes.
By End User · 3 segments
Government & Defense Agencies Led by End user in 2025, with Commercial Enterprises Growing Fastest
- Largest Government & Defense Agencies · 40%
- Fastest Commercial Enterprises · 36.7%
- Moves most Commercial Enterprises · +20.5 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government & Defense Agencies | $0.58B | 40% | $4.20B | 28.9%-11.1 | 24.6% |
| Academic & Research Institutes | $0.42B | 29% | $2.85B | 19.6%-9.4 | 23.7% |
| Commercial Enterprises | $0.45B | 31% | $7.50B | 51.5%+20.5 | 36.7% |
Government and defense agencies lead because their funding predates commercial demand and continues to underwrite the largest dedicated quantum computing programs. Commercial enterprises are growing fastest as cloud access lowers the cost of experimentation and early pilots in finance, chemicals and logistics start to justify larger recurring budgets, pulling spending away from the research-only use that defined the market's first decade. Leadership changes hands: Commercial Enterprises is the largest line by 2034, not Government & Defense Agencies.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025
Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered — 5.3 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 8.9×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 48.3%
- By 2034 43%
- Revenue $0.70B → $6.25B
In North America, 48.3% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 0.7 billion rising to USD 6.25 billion in 2034. Among the five regions it ranks first by revenue in both years.
43% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Hardware the largest line at 53.1% of 2025 revenue and Software the fastest-growing at 33.35%. Per-axis and per-country detail for North America sits in the full report.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 88.6% of it, growing 8.6×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 88.6%
- Of global 42.8%
- Revenue $0.62B → $5.31B
The United States is the largest market within North America, generating USD 0.62 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 5.31 billion by 2034. At 88.6% of regional revenue in the base year it is not one market among several, the region's trajectory is largely this country's trajectory. Against regional totals of USD 0.7 billion in 2025 and USD 6.25 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is Hardware at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, easing to 43.7% by 2034, and the fastest is Software at 33.35%, from 25.5% to 34.4%. Since 88.6% of North America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. The United States carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
Quantum computing hardware and related technical data fall under the Bureau of Industry and Security's Export Administration Regulations, since the Department of Commerce added quantum computing and related cryogenic and control-electronics items to the Commerce Control List as dual-use technology. A supplier must classify each system against the relevant Export Control Classification Number and secure a licence before shipping to restricted destinations or foreign nationals from certain countries within domestic facilities. The National Institute of Standards and Technology separately sets the post-quantum cryptographic standards that downstream software and communications vendors are expected to adopt. No dedicated product-safety regime exists specifically for quantum processors; general electronics and laboratory-equipment standards still apply.
In the United States the field is D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing.. Volume sits in Hardware at 53.1% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Software at 33.35% growth. The full report covers country-level positioning and shares company by company; this summary does not.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 11.7×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 11.4%
- Of global 5.5%
- Revenue $0.08B → $0.94B
Within North America, Canada accounts for 11.4% of regional revenue and 5.5% of the global total, worth USD 0.08 billion in 2025 and USD 0.94 billion by 2034.
Europe Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered — 1.8 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 9.3×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 22.8%
- By 2034 21%
- Revenue $0.33B → $3.06B
Europe holds 22.8% of the global quantum computing market in 2025, worth USD 0.33 billion and reaches USD 3.06 billion by 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, second by revenue throughout the period.
Share settles at 21% in 2034, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Hardware largest at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, Software fastest at 33.35%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Europe sits in the full report.
United Kingdom
The largest market in Europe, growing 9.3×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 42.4%
- Of global 9.7%
- Revenue $0.14B → $1.30B
The United Kingdom is the largest market within Europe, generating USD 0.14 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 1.3 billion by 2034. Its 42.4% of base-year regional revenue leads the region, though enough sits elsewhere that Europe is not a proxy for it. Set against USD 0.33 billion and USD 3.06 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
the United Kingdom buys along the same lines as the market globally; Hardware first at 53.1% of 2025 revenue and 43.7% in 2034, Software fastest at 33.35% on a share moving from 25.5% to 34.4%. Because the country carries 42.4% of Europe, a movement in its own mix shows up in the regional totals instead of being averaged away by neighbouring markets. The full report reports the United Kingdom by type separately.
United Kingdom exports of quantum computing systems and associated technical know-how are controlled under the Export Control Order, administered by the Export Control Joint Unit within the Department for Business and Trade, since these systems appear on the UK Strategic Export Control Lists as dual-use goods. A supplier seeking to move hardware, software or expertise outside the country must apply for an export licence and demonstrate the end use is not tied to weapons proliferation. The National Cyber Security Centre publishes guidance steering organisations toward post-quantum cryptographic migration, offered as advisory guidance and not a binding product standard. Domestic sale of the hardware itself is not subject to a separate licensing regime beyond general electrical safety marking requirements.
The suppliers tracked in this study (D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing.) compete in the United Kingdom across the type lines above. The commercially relevant division is 53.1% of 2025 revenue in Hardware, where the volume is, against 33.35% growth in Software, where share moves. A supplier weighted toward Europe is competing over a base of USD 0.33 billion in 2025 reaching USD 3.06 billion by 2034, 22.8% of global revenue at the start of that period.
Germany
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 9.1×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 33.3%
- Of global 7.6%
- Revenue $0.11B → $1B
7.6% of global revenue is generated in Germany; USD 0.11 billion in 2025, reaching USD 1 billion in 2034, and 33.3% of Europe.
France
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 9.2×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 18.2%
- Of global 4.1%
- Revenue $0.06B → $0.55B
France is sized at USD 0.06 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.55 billion by 2034; 4.1% of global revenue and 18.2% of Europe. It is reported separately from the United Kingdom across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 5.9 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 12.7×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 22.1%
- By 2034 28%
- Revenue $0.32B → $4.07B
USD 0.32 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Asia Pacific, 22.1% of the global quantum computing market and reaches USD 4.07 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits third across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
Its share rises to 28% over the forecast period, so the region grows faster than the market's 28.98% and takes a larger part of the revenue added by 2034 than its 2025 weight implies.
Within the region the type split tracks the global one; 53.1% of 2025 revenue in Hardware, fastest growth of 33.35% in Software. Revenue for Asia Pacific is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 13.1×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 43.8%
- Of global 9.7%
- Revenue $0.14B → $1.83B
43.8% of Asia Pacific's base-year revenue comes from China; USD 0.14 billion, rising to USD 1.83 billion by 2034. 43.8% of the region in the base year makes it the largest market here without making it the region. The region itself runs USD 0.32 billion to USD 4.07 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
China buys along the same lines as the market globally; Hardware first at 53.1% of 2025 revenue and 43.7% in 2034, Software fastest at 33.35% on a share moving from 25.5% to 34.4%. Since 43.8% of Asia Pacific's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. The full report reports China by type separately.
China's Ministry of Commerce controls the export of quantum computing equipment, components and associated technology through its catalogue of technologies subject to export licensing, with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and state security authorities reviewing sensitive cases involving cryptographic or defense-relevant applications. A domestic supplier must obtain an export licence before technology transfer to overseas parties and register cryptography-related products with the State Cryptography Administration if the system incorporates encryption functions. Standards conformity for laboratory and industrial electronics follows the national GB standards system administered by the State Administration for Market Regulation. Foreign entities seeking to supply into China's quantum sector face additional review under the national security and technology-import approval processes.
In China the field is D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing.. Hardware, at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Software, growing at 33.35%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. Weighting toward Asia Pacific means competing for 22.1% of 2025 global revenue, a base of USD 0.32 billion moving to USD 4.07 billion across the forecast period.
Japan
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 11.4×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 31.3%
- Of global 6.9%
- Revenue $0.10B → $1.14B
Japan is sized at USD 0.1 billion in 2025, rising to USD 1.14 billion by 2034; 6.9% of global revenue and 31.3% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from China across every segmentation axis in the full report.
South Korea
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 12.2×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15.6%
- Of global 3.4%
- Revenue $0.05B → $0.61B
3.4% of global revenue is generated in South Korea; USD 0.05 billion in 2025, reaching USD 0.61 billion in 2034, and 15.6% of Asia Pacific.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.2 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 11.0×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 2.8%
- By 2034 3%
- Revenue $0.04B → $0.44B
2.8% of the global quantum computing market sits in Latin America in 2025, worth USD 0.04 billion and reaches USD 0.44 billion by 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fifth by revenue throughout the period.
Its share rises to 3% over the forecast period, on growth above the market's own 28.98%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
Hardware leads here as it does globally, at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, and Software again grows fastest at 33.35%. The full report breaks Latin America out along every axis and by country.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 12.0×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 50%
- Of global 1.4%
- Revenue $0.02B → $0.24B
Brazil is the largest market within Latin America, generating USD 0.02 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 0.24 billion by 2034. At 50% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Latin America's revenue is generated in other markets. Set against USD 0.04 billion and USD 0.44 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
Demand in Brazil follows the type mix reported at global level: Hardware is the largest line at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, moving to 43.7% by 2034, while Software grows fastest at 33.35% and takes its share from 25.5% to 34.4%. Since 50% of Latin America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. The full report reports Brazil by type separately.
Brazil has no regulator dedicated to quantum computing hardware, so oversight falls to the general framework for controlled and dual-use goods administered by the Brazilian Army's Directorate of Controlled Products, which reviews exports and imports of technology deemed sensitive for defense or security purposes. A supplier bringing quantum systems that incorporate cryptographic modules into the country must also satisfy the National Telecommunications Agency's homologation requirements if the equipment connects to public networks, and comply with the encryption-import notification process overseen by the Institutional Security Cabinet. General electrical and safety certification through INMETRO applies to imported laboratory and computing hardware regardless of its quantum function.
Competition in Brazil runs between the suppliers this study tracks: D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing.. The commercially relevant division is 53.1% of 2025 revenue in Hardware, where the volume is, against 33.35% growth in Software, where share moves. A supplier weighted toward Latin America is competing over a base of USD 0.04 billion in 2025 reaching USD 0.44 billion by 2034, 2.8% of global revenue at the start of that period.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 12.0×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 25%
- Of global 0.7%
- Revenue $0.01B → $0.12B
Within Latin America, Mexico accounts for 25% of regional revenue and 0.7% of the global total, worth USD 0.01 billion in 2025 and USD 0.12 billion by 2034.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.9 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 12.2×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 4.1%
- By 2034 5%
- Revenue $0.06B → $0.73B
4.1% of the global quantum computing market sits in Middle East and Africa in 2025, worth USD 0.06 billion on the way to USD 0.73 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits fourth across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
By 2034 the share has moved up to 5%, on growth above the market's own 28.98%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
Hardware leads here as it does globally, at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, and Software again grows fastest at 33.35%. The full report breaks Middle East and Africa out along every axis and by country.
Israel
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 9.7×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 50%
- Of global 2.1%
- Revenue $0.03B → $0.29B
USD 0.03 billion of Middle East and Africa's 2025 revenue is generated in Israel, the region's largest market, reaching USD 0.29 billion by 2034. At 50% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated in other markets. Against regional totals of USD 0.06 billion in 2025 and USD 0.73 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Israel buys along the same lines as the market globally; Hardware first at 53.1% of 2025 revenue and 43.7% in 2034, Software fastest at 33.35% on a share moving from 25.5% to 34.4%. Because the country carries 50% of Middle East and Africa, a movement in its own mix shows up in the regional totals instead of being averaged away by neighbouring markets. Israel carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
Israel regulates the export of quantum computing systems and related technical data under the Defense Export Control Law, enforced by the Defense Export Control Agency within the Ministry of Defense, since these systems sit on the country's control lists for dual-use technology given their cryptographic and defense-relevant applications. A supplier must obtain a marketing licence before offering the technology abroad and a further export licence before shipment, with end-use and end-user declarations reviewed case by case. The Israel National Cyber Directorate issues guidance on cryptographic resilience that informs how domestic developers approach post-quantum readiness, though it does not impose a certification scheme. Standard electronics and laboratory safety marking still governs the physical hardware.
D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing. are the suppliers covered in Israel. Hardware, at 53.1% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Software, growing at 33.35%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. Weighting toward Middle East and Africa means competing for 4.1% of 2025 global revenue, a base of USD 0.06 billion moving to USD 0.73 billion across the forecast period.
United Arab Emirates
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 10.0×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 33.3%
- Of global 1.4%
- Revenue $0.02B → $0.20B
Within Middle East and Africa, the United Arab Emirates accounts for 33.3% of regional revenue and 1.4% of the global total, worth USD 0.02 billion in 2025 and USD 0.2 billion by 2034.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Type, Application, Technology, Deployment Model, End User, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Position on the Type Axis Decides Competitive Standing
The study covers the following suppliers: D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch and Rigetti Computing..
Where suppliers actually compete is along the type axis. Hardware is 53.1% of 2025 revenue at USD 0.77 billion and still 43.7% in 2034, so it is where the volume sits and where an incumbent's position is hardest to move. Software, compounding at 33.35% against 26.34% for Hardware, is where share changes hands over the forecast period. A supplier positioned in one is not automatically positioned in the other, so a field of this size stays viable in a market of USD 1.45 billion.
In quantum computing, the clearest advantage sits with companies that can sustain the capital intensity of building and iterating physical qubit systems over multiple hardware generations, since a faster iteration cycle compounds into better coherence times and error rates. Cloud distribution reach matters nearly as much: a company whose machines are accessible through a major cloud platform reaches far more pilot customers than one selling standalone systems. Smaller and more specialized suppliers compete on a specific qubit modality, on software and error-mitigation tooling that runs across multiple vendors' hardware, or on early relationships with a narrow set of government and research customers that a larger generalist has not prioritized.
Presence matters unevenly by region. With 48.3% of 2025 revenue in North America and 22.8% in Europe, a supplier's coverage of those two decides most of its addressable base before any product question arises.
Per-company profiles, financials, share and development history are in the full report and not here.
List of Key Quantum Computing Market Companies Profiled
16 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- D-Wave Systems(Canada)
- Google(United States)
- IBM(United States)
- Intel(United States)
- Microsoft(United States)
- 1QB Information Technologies(Canada)
- Anyon Systems(Canada)
- Cambridge Quantum Computing(United Kingdom)
- ID Quantique(Switzerland)
- IonQ(United States)
- QbitLogic
- QC Ware(United States)
- Quantum Circuits(United States)
- Qubitekk(United States)
- QxBranch(United States)
- Rigetti Computing.
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Type, Application, Technology, Deployment Model, End User), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 16 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Quantum Computing Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Quantum Computing Market Overview, By Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Quantum Computing Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Quantum Computing Market Overview, By Technology, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Quantum Computing Market Overview, By Deployment Model, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Quantum Computing Market Overview, By End User, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Quantum Computing Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Quantum Computing Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Quantum Computing Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Quantum Computing Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Quantum Computing Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Quantum Computing Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Quantum Computing Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Type
3- 01Hardware
- 02Software
- 03Services
By Application
5- 01Defense
- 02Banking & finance
- 03Chemicals
- 04Healthcare & pharmaceuticals
- 05Energy & power
By Technology
4- 01Superconducting
- 02Trapped Ion
- 03Quantum Annealing
- 04Photonic
By Deployment Model
2- 01On-Premises
- 02Cloud-Based
By End User
3- 01Government & Defense Agencies
- 02Academic & Research Institutes
- 03Commercial Enterprises
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Type. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
The bottom-up build starts from the installed and cloud-accessible base of quantum processing units by qubit modality, the realized system and subscription prices those units carry, and the per-workload service and integration fees layered on top. Government contract values and cloud-access pricing tiers anchor the hardware and services lines; enterprise software license and support pricing anchors the software line. This build is checked against the disclosed revenue of publicly listed quantum computing companies, whose reported hardware, software and services splits provide a direct point of comparison. Where the two diverge, for example when a company's disclosed revenue implies a different mix of hardware versus service revenue than the unit-based build assumed, the unit-level pricing or volume assumption is the one that gets corrected, not the disclosed figure.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Interviews target the roles that actually commit budget and set technical requirements in this market: procurement and R&D leads at national laboratories and defense agencies, heads of innovation or advanced technology groups at banks, pharmaceutical and chemical companies, and product and pricing leads at the hardware and cloud-access vendors themselves. Sampling weights toward the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and China, since national quantum programs and corporate quantum budgets are concentrated in those geographies, with additional coverage in Canada and Japan to capture research-institute and early commercial adoption patterns that a US- and Europe-only sample would miss.
Desk research draws on the SEC filings of publicly listed quantum computing hardware providers, national quantum strategy and funding disclosures published by defense and science ministries, patent filings tracked through national and international patent offices for qubit and error-correction technology, and procurement records from government quantum computing initiatives. University and national laboratory research-grant registers are used to cross-check where public research funding is concentrated by qubit modality, and cloud-platform pricing pages provide the realized price points used in the services build.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from the pace at which cloud-based access lowers the cost of quantum experimentation, the rate at which error-correction and coherence improvements are expected to extend the range of problems current hardware can address, and the pricing behavior of vendors moving from bespoke government contracts toward standardized subscription tiers. Government funding commitments already announced set a floor under the defense and research end-user lines; they are not adjusted downward as a discretionary estimate would be. The forecast holds if qubit error rates continue improving on their recent trajectory; a stall in error correction would flatten the software and services lines that assume a widening range of solvable workloads.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Outputs are back-tested against the revenue growth publicly listed quantum computing companies have already recorded, checking that the modeled hardware and services growth rates do not outrun what those companies' own multi-year disclosures support. Segment share shifts, particularly the move from on-premises to cloud-based access and from government to commercial end users, are reviewed against vendor-reported customer counts and cloud-platform usage disclosures where available. Sensitivities were tested on the pace of error-correction improvement and on government funding renewal, since those two assumptions carry the most influence over the shape of the later forecast years.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmest on the hardware and government end-user lines, where publicly disclosed contract values and listed-company revenue give a direct anchor. It is thinner on the software and commercial-enterprise lines, where adoption is still mostly at pilot stage and few vendors break out software revenue separately from hardware or services. The clearest risk to this estimate is a slower-than-assumed pace of error-correction improvement, which would compress the range of commercially useful workloads and push part of the forecast's later-year growth out beyond 2034 instead of removing it from the forecast altogether.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Quantum Computing Market projected to reach?
USD 14.55 Billion by 2034, CAGR 28.98%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 48.3% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
Hardware is the largest line by Type, at 53.1% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
D-Wave Systems, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, 1QB Information Technologies, Anyon Systems, Cambridge Quantum Computing, ID Quantique, IonQ, QbitLogic, QC Ware, Quantum Circuits, Qubitekk, QxBranch, Rigetti Computing.. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.