Pipeline Monitoring System MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By TechnologyBy Pipe TypeBy ApplicationBy Industry VerticalBy Component
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Pipeline Monitoring System Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Technology (PIGs, Smart Ball, Acoustic/Ultrasonic, Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology, Fiber Optic Technology, Mass Volume/Balance, LIDAR, Vapor Sensing, Others), By Pipe Type (Metallic, Non-metallic, Others), By Application (Leak Detection, Operating Condition, Pipeline Break Detection, Others), By Industry Vertical (Oil & Gas, Water & Wastewater, Others), By Component (Hardware, Software, Services), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Market outlook, key takeaways, drivers and challenges for the report period.
- 01By TechnologyPIGs · Smart Ball · Acoustic/Ultrasonic
- 02By Pipe TypeMetallic · Non-metallic · Others
- 03By ApplicationLeak Detection · Operating Condition · Pipeline Break Detection
- 04By Industry VerticalOil & Gas · Water & Wastewater · Others
- 05By ComponentHardware · Software · Services
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
A pipeline monitoring system combines sensors, inline inspection tools and software that track a pipeline's physical condition and the fluid or gas moving through it, detecting leaks, corrosion, mechanical damage and abnormal operating conditions along its length. Systems range from tethered or free-swimming inline inspection tools run through the pipe itself to fixed acoustic, fiber optic and magnetic sensing installed along the route, paired with software that turns those readings into alerts. Buyers are pipeline operators in oil and gas transmission and gathering, and water and wastewater utilities, who install these systems to meet safety regulation and to limit product loss.
USD 17.5 billion of revenue was recorded in the global pipeline monitoring system market in 2025. By 2034 the figure reaches USD 40 billion, a compound annual growth rate of 9.61% through the forecast period, along a series that runs USD 10.8 billion in 2020, USD 15.6 billion in 2024, USD 19.2 billion in 2026 and USD 28 billion in 2030.
The technology mix shifts over the period. PIGs is the largest line in 2025 at USD 4.2 billion, a 24% share, moving to USD 7.6 billion and 19% by 2034. LIDAR grows fastest at 14.53%, taking its share from 4% to 6%, while PIGs grows slowest at 6.77%. Smart Ball, Acoustic/Ultrasonic, Fiber Optic Technology, LIDAR, Vapor Sensing and Others take share over the period; PIGs, Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology and Mass Volume/Balance give it up while still growing in absolute terms.
The pipe type split puts Metallic first, at USD 11.9 billion and 68% of revenue in 2025, rising to USD 24.8 billion and 62% in 2034. Non-metallic grows faster at 12.27% against 8.5%, moving from 25% of revenue to 31% by 2034. It cuts the same total as the technology axis from a different commercial angle, so revenue does not add across the two.
The regional order runs from North America at 32% of 2025 revenue down to Latin America at 7%. North America is worth USD 5.6 billion in 2025 and USD 11.6 billion in 2034; Asia Pacific, second at 27%, moves from USD 4.73 billion to USD 12.4 billion. Because Asia Pacific and Middle East and Africa take share, the revenue added by 2034 concentrates instead of spreading across all five regions.
Behind these figures sit five regions, nine technology lines and five segmentation axes, each reported for every year from 2020 to 2034. The headline 2025 value is arrived at by triangulating published aggregates against category proxies, not by an independent count, and the same applies to the segment, regional and country breakdowns drawn from it.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- A forecast-period rate of 9.61% takes the market from USD 17.5 billion in 2025 to USD 40 billion in 2034, against 10.14% recorded over the 2020-2025 historical period.
- The largest line by technology is PIGs, worth USD 4.2 billion and 24% of revenue in 2025, rising to USD 7.6 billion and 19% by 2034.
- LIDAR is the fastest-growing line at 14.53%, lifting its share from 4% in 2025 to 6% in 2034 and its revenue from USD 0.7 billion to USD 2.4 billion.
- Against a base case of USD 40 billion in 2034, the study also reports a bear case at USD 29.9 billion and a bull case at USD 46.5 billion, with the assumptions behind each set out separately.
- North America holds 32% of global revenue in 2025 at USD 5.6 billion, the largest of the five regions tracked, and reaches USD 11.6 billion by 2034.
- Within North America, the United States is the worked country example, at USD 4.592 billion in 2025; 82% of regional revenue in the base year, and USD 9.396 billion by 2034.
- The study covers 2020 through 2034 with 2025 as the base year, reporting five regions and five segmentation axes separately, with revenue, share and a growth rate for every line in each year.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By by technology
Base year 2025PIGs leads with 24.0% of by technology segment revenue.
Share of by technology segment revenue, most recent base year. The 3 smallest segments are grouped as Other.
Three movements define the forecast period in the global pipeline monitoring system market: how the technology mix changes, where regional weight shifts, and the rate at which the total compounds.
Not one of them points downward. Growth is everywhere in absolute terms, and the interest is entirely in where it lands.
Composition shifts on the technology axis. LIDAR grows at 14.53% across 2026-2034 against 6.77% for PIGs, the widest spread on the technology axis. Over the forecast period that moves LIDAR from 4% of revenue to 6%, and PIGs from 24% to 19%. Revenue rises on both sides; USD 0.7 billion to USD 2.4 billion and USD 4.2 billion to USD 7.6 billion respectively, so this is a change in composition, not a contraction, and one forecast window is long enough for it to matter.
Growth concentrates in Asia Pacific and Middle East and Africa. Asia Pacific moves from 27% of revenue in 2025 to 31% in 2034, worth USD 4.73 billion rising to USD 12.4 billion; Middle East and Africa moves from 14% of revenue in 2025 to 15% in 2034, worth USD 2.45 billion rising to USD 6 billion. The offsetting side is North America at 32% moving to 29%, Europe at 20% moving to 18%, Latin America at 7% moving to 7%, none of which contracts. Growth is therefore not something a participant inherits from the market; it depends on which regions its revenue is weighted toward.
Growth compounds at 9.61% without a step change. Year by year the total runs USD 10.8 billion in 2020, USD 15.6 billion in 2024, USD 17.5 billion in 2025, USD 19.2 billion in 2026, USD 28 billion in 2030 and USD 40 billion in 2034. Against 10.14% through the historical period, the 9.61% forecast rate is a continuation; no year in the series interrupts it. A plan built on this market is therefore a plan about capturing a share of steady expansion, which is decided on the technology and regional axes, not by the headline rate.
Market Growth Factors
LIDAR adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01LIDAR adds the most incremental growth
LIDAR compounds at 14.53% against 9.61% for the market, rising from USD 0.7 billion in 2025 to USD 2.4 billion in 2034 and from 4% of revenue to 6%. The market's overall 9.61% depends on that rate holding: at the 6.77% recorded by PIGs, the same revenue base would compound to a materially smaller 2034 total. That makes position on the technology axis a growth decision, not a product one.
- 02Growth lands where the revenue already is
32% of 2025 revenue (USD 5.6 billion) is generated in North America, reaching USD 11.6 billion by 2034 at an unchanged 29%. Asia Pacific adds a further 27% at USD 4.73 billion, reaching USD 12.4 billion. Together the two account for the majority of both the 2025 base and the revenue added by 2034, which is why a regional plan treating all five regions at equal weight misreads where the growth actually lands.
- 03Fifteen years of unbroken growth underpin the forecast
Revenue rose through USD 10.8 billion in 2020, USD 15.6 billion in 2024 and USD 17.5 billion in 2025, a compound 10.14% across the historical period. The forecast period then runs at 9.61%, ending 2034 at USD 40 billion. A forecast extending an observed trend is a different proposition from one proposing a turn, and that is why no ramp is applied: the 9.61% runs evenly across the period.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aging pipeline infrastructure and integrity-regulation mandates | High | +7.2 | High | High | High |
| 2 | Oil and gas transmission capacity additions in Asia Pacific and the Middle East | High | +6.1 | High | High | Medium |
| 3 | Shift to continuous real-time monitoring via fiber optic and acoustic sensing | Medium-High | +4.8 | Medium | High | High |
| 4 | Water utility adoption to cut non-revenue water losses | Medium | +3.1 | Low | Medium | Medium |
| 5 | Tightening leak-detection and emissions-related regulation | Medium | +2.9 | Medium | Medium | High |
| 6 | Others | Low | +1.2 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +25.3 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High upfront capital cost of retrofitting monitoring onto existing pipeline networks | Medium-High | −1.8 | High | Medium | Low |
| 2 | Delayed integrity-program capital spending during lower oil-price cycles | Medium | −1 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| 3 | Fragmented monitoring standards across regions slowing system integration | Low | −0.3 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | −3.1 | |||||
Drivers contribute 25.3 Billion and restraints remove 3.1 Billion, a net 22.2 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Three sources account for the growth to 2034: 9.61% compounding across the base, share moving toward the faster technology lines, and above-market expansion in the leading regions.
Restraining Factors
What holds the forecast back
Market Restraints
2- 01What holds the forecast back
Bear assumes a renewed oil-price downturn delays midstream integrity-program capex and water utilities defer non-revenue-water investment, slowing the shift away from established PIGs-based inspection toward newer sensing technologies. On that assumption 2034 revenue lands at USD 29.9 billion against the USD 40 billion base case, from the same USD 17.5 billion 2025 starting point.
- 02PIGs holds the blended rate down
PIGs carries 24% of 2025 revenue at USD 4.2 billion but compounds at 6.77% against 9.61% for the market, taking its share to 19% by 2034 even as revenue rises to USD 7.6 billion. Because it carries that much of the base, its pace holds the blended rate down more than any faster line lifts it.
Market Opportunities
Upside case: USD 46.5 billion by 2034
Market Opportunities
2- 01Upside case: USD 46.5 billion by 2034
What would beat the forecast: bull assumes faster-than-base fiber optic and acoustic sensing retrofit rates plus accelerated Asia Pacific and Middle East pipeline capacity additions, both proceeding without the capex pauses a normal investment cycle would otherwise impose. That case reaches USD 46.5 billion in 2034 against USD 40 billion, and it is worth testing against a reader's own read of the market.
- 02LIDAR share moves from 4% to 6%
Share on the technology axis moves toward LIDAR, from 4% in 2025 to 6% in 2034, on 14.53% growth against the market's 9.61% and revenue rising from USD 0.7 billion to USD 2.4 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds PIGs, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
The total depends on a single line
Market Challenges
2- 01The total depends on a single line
USD 4.2 billion of 2025 revenue sits in PIGs, 24% of the total, and it is still 19% at USD 7.6 billion nine years later. Anything that changes demand for it changes the headline number; nothing else on the axis carries that weight.
- 02Single-country exposure in North America
82% of the leading region is one country: the United States, at USD 4.592 billion against North America's USD 5.6 billion in 2025, and USD 9.396 billion by 2034. A regional number that depends this heavily on one country carries that country's specific conditions inside it, which a reader treating the region as diversified would miss.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesfive segmentation axes are reported; by technology, by pipe type, application, industry vertical and component. Each axis cuts the same total revenue along a different commercial dimension, so the splits are alternative views of one market, not additions to it.
All nine technology lines expand in revenue terms over the forecast period. Share is the dividing line; six take it, the others cede it.
By Technology · 9 segments
By Technology
- Largest PIGs · 24%
- Fastest LIDAR · 14.5%
- Moves most PIGs · -5 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIGs | $4.20B | 24% | $7.60B | 19%-5 | 6.8% |
| Smart Ball | $1.58B | 9% | $3.80B | 9.5%+0.5 | 10.3% |
| Acoustic/Ultrasonic | $2.97B | 17% | $7B | 17.5%+0.5 | 10% |
| Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology | $2.80B | 16% | $5.20B | 13%-3 | 7.1% |
| Fiber Optic Technology | $2.45B | 14% | $7.60B | 19%+5 | 13.3% |
| Mass Volume/Balance | $1.40B | 8% | $2.80B | 7%-1 | 8% |
| LIDAR | $0.70B | 4% | $2.40B | 6%+2 | 14.5% |
| Vapor Sensing | $0.70B | 4% | $1.80B | 4.5%+0.5 | 11% |
| Others | $0.70B | 4% | $1.80B | 4.5%+0.5 | 11% |
2025 to 2034 revenue and share by line: PIGs USD 4.2 billion to USD 7.6 billion (24% in 2025), Acoustic/Ultrasonic USD 2.97 billion to USD 7 billion (17% in 2025), Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology USD 2.8 billion to USD 5.2 billion (16% in 2025), Fiber Optic Technology USD 2.45 billion to USD 7.6 billion (14% in 2025), Smart Ball USD 1.58 billion to USD 3.8 billion (9% in 2025), Mass Volume/Balance USD 1.4 billion to USD 2.8 billion (8% in 2025), LIDAR USD 0.7 billion to USD 2.4 billion (4% in 2025), Vapor Sensing USD 0.7 billion to USD 1.8 billion (4% in 2025), Others USD 0.7 billion to USD 1.8 billion (4% in 2025). LIDAR Outpaces the Axis While PIGs Holds the Largest Share PIGs lead because inline inspection tools already meet pipeline-safety regulators' inspection intervals for metallic transmission lines at lower cost than replacing that inspection method outright. Fiber optic sensing is growing fastest because it enables continuous, real-time monitoring over long pipeline corridors without moving parts, making it well suited to retrofitting onto pipelines that stay in service for decades. PIGs remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Pipe Type · 3 segments
Non-metallic Outpaces the Axis While Metallic Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Metallic · 68%
- Fastest Non-metallic · 12.3%
- Moves most Metallic · -6 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metallic | $11.90B | 68% | $24.80B | 62%-6 | 8.5% |
| Non-metallic | $4.38B | 25% | $12.40B | 31%+6 | 12.3% |
| Others | $1.23B | 7% | $2.80B | 7% | 9.6% |
Metallic pipelines lead because the installed transmission network was built predominantly from steel and still carries the bulk of oil and gas volumes moved today. Non-metallic pipe is growing fastest as water and gas distribution utilities switch to composite and polyethylene piping for corrosion resistance, which in turn requires monitoring approaches suited to non-magnetic materials. The order does not change: Metallic is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds.
By Application · 4 segments
Leak Detection Both Leads the Application Axis and Grows Fastest on It
- Largest Leak Detection · 46%
- Fastest Leak Detection · 10.4%
- Moves most Leak Detection · +3 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leak Detection | $8.05B | 46% | $19.60B | 49%+3 | 10.4% |
| Operating Condition | $4.90B | 28% | $10B | 25%-3 | 8.3% |
| Pipeline Break Detection | $3.15B | 18% | $7.20B | 18% | 9.6% |
| Others | $1.40B | 8% | $3.20B | 8% | 9.6% |
Leak detection leads because pipeline safety regulators require continuous monitoring for release events ahead of any other condition check. It is also the fastest-growing application as tightening environmental rules and public scrutiny following past spill incidents push operators to prioritize leak-specific systems over general operating-condition monitoring. Leak Detection remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
By Industry Vertical · 3 segments
Oil & Gas Held the Dominant Share of the Industry vertical Segment in 2025
- Largest Oil & Gas · 71%
- Fastest Water & Wastewater · 12.1%
- Moves most Oil & Gas · -5 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil & Gas | $12.43B | 71% | $26.40B | 66%-5 | 8.7% |
| Water & Wastewater | $3.85B | 22% | $10.80B | 27%+5 | 12.1% |
| Others | $1.23B | 7% | $2.80B | 7% | 9.6% |
Oil and gas leads because its transmission and gathering networks are the largest and oldest installed base requiring continuous integrity monitoring under long-standing regulatory mandate. Water and wastewater is growing fastest as utilities replace manual leak inspection with automated systems to cut non-revenue water losses and meet tightening infrastructure-investment mandates from regulators and investors alike. By 2034 Oil & Gas is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
By Component · 3 segments
Software Outpaces the Axis While Hardware Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Hardware · 52%
- Fastest Software · 12.2%
- Moves most Hardware · -6 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | $9.10B | 52% | $18.40B | 46%-6 | 8.1% |
| Software | $4.55B | 26% | $12.80B | 32%+6 | 12.2% |
| Services | $3.85B | 22% | $8.80B | 22% | 9.6% |
Hardware leads because sensor arrays, inline tools and edge devices remain the largest line item in any new deployment. Software is growing fastest as operators shift spend toward analytics platforms that convert raw sensor data into leak and integrity alerts, an upgrade path that costs less than replacing hardware already installed in the field. Hardware remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered — 3 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.1×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 32%
- By 2034 29%
- Revenue $5.60B → $11.60B
North America holds 32% of the global pipeline monitoring system market in 2025, worth USD 5.6 billion rising to USD 11.6 billion in 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, first by revenue throughout the period.
29% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: PIGs largest at 24% of 2025 revenue, LIDAR fastest at 14.53%. The full report breaks North America out along every axis and by country.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 82% of it, growing 2.0×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 82%
- Of global 26.2%
- Revenue $4.59B → $9.40B
USD 4.592 billion of North America's 2025 revenue is generated in the United States, the region's largest market, reaching USD 9.396 billion by 2034. Carrying 82% of the region in the base year, it sets North America's direction instead of merely contributing to it. Regional revenue of USD 5.6 billion in 2025 and USD 11.6 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Demand in the United States follows the technology mix reported at global level: PIGs is the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue, moving to 19% by 2034, while LIDAR grows fastest at 14.53% and takes its share from 4% to 6%. Its 82% weight in North America means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. Revenue by technology for the United States is reported separately in the full report.
Pipeline monitoring systems installed on hazardous liquid and gas pipelines fall under the oversight of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration within the Department of Transportation. Operators must integrate monitoring and leak detection capability that meets PHMSA's control room management and integrity management requirements, and the underlying instrumentation is expected to conform to standards published by the American Petroleum Institute and related bodies referenced in federal pipeline safety rules. Wireless telemetry components used in these systems also need certification from the Federal Communications Commission before sale. Suppliers typically document conformity through third-party testing and maintain records supporting an operator's compliance filings with the agency.
Competition in the United States runs between the suppliers this study tracks: ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding PIGs at 24% of 2025 revenue, and taking LIDAR while it grows at 14.53%. Country-level shares and positioning per company sit in the full report.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 2.2×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 18%
- Of global 5.8%
- Revenue $1.01B → $2.20B
5.76% of global revenue is generated in Canada; USD 1.008 billion in 2025, reaching USD 2.204 billion in 2034, and 18% of North America.
Europe Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered — 2 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.1×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 20%
- By 2034 18%
- Revenue $3.50B → $7.20B
20% of the global pipeline monitoring system market sits in Europe in 2025, worth USD 3.5 billion with USD 7.2 billion projected for 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, third by revenue throughout the period.
Share settles at 18% in 2034, though revenue still rises throughout; the shift is in the region's weight against faster-growing ones, which is not the same as weakening demand.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: PIGs largest at 24% of 2025 revenue, LIDAR fastest at 14.53%. Revenue for Europe is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Germany
The largest market in Europe, growing 2.0×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 30%
- Of global 6%
- Revenue $1.05B → $2.09B
USD 1.05 billion of Europe's 2025 revenue is generated in Germany, the region's largest market, reaching USD 2.088 billion by 2034. Its 30% of base-year regional revenue leads the region, though enough sits elsewhere that Europe is not a proxy for it. Regional revenue of USD 3.5 billion in 2025 and USD 7.2 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
The technology pattern in Germany is the global one: 24% of 2025 revenue in PIGs, 19% by 2034, against 14.53% growth in LIDAR taking it from 4% to 6%. With 30% of Europe concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. Germany carries its own technology breakdown in the full report.
Pipeline monitoring equipment sold in Germany must meet European Union conformity requirements before it can carry the CE mark, drawing on directives covering pressure equipment, electromagnetic compatibility and, where relevant, equipment intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres. The Bundesnetzagentur oversees the safety and technical operation of energy pipeline networks, while the German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water publishes the detailed technical codes that pipeline operators and their monitoring suppliers are expected to follow in practice. A supplier entering this market generally needs both a conformity declaration for its hardware and evidence that its system design aligns with these national technical rules, since German enforcement leans heavily on codified engineering standards.
The suppliers tracked in this study (ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG) compete in Germany across the technology lines above. PIGs, at 24% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and LIDAR, growing at 14.53%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. That makes Europe a 20% share of 2025 global revenue, USD 3.5 billion rising to USD 7.2 billion, for any supplier deciding where to concentrate.
United Kingdom
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 2.0×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 22%
- Of global 4.4%
- Revenue $0.77B → $1.51B
4.4% of global revenue is generated in the United Kingdom; USD 0.77 billion in 2025, reaching USD 1.512 billion in 2034, and 22% of Europe.
Norway
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 1.9×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 18%
- Of global 3.6%
- Revenue $0.63B → $1.22B
Within Europe, Norway accounts for 18% of regional revenue and 3.6% of the global total, worth USD 0.63 billion in 2025 and USD 1.224 billion by 2034.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 4 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.6×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 27%
- By 2034 31%
- Revenue $4.73B → $12.40B
In Asia Pacific, 27% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 4.73 billion with USD 12.4 billion projected for 2034. Among the five regions it ranks second by revenue in both years.
By 2034 the share has moved up to 31%, because it outgrows the market's 9.61%; the revenue added here is disproportionate to where the region started.
PIGs leads here as it does globally, at 24% of 2025 revenue, and LIDAR again grows fastest at 14.53%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Asia Pacific sits in the full report.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 2.6×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 45%
- Of global 12.2%
- Revenue $2.13B → $5.46B
The largest single market in Asia Pacific is China, at USD 2.12625 billion in 2025 and USD 5.456 billion in 2034. It accounts for 45% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Regional revenue of USD 4.73 billion in 2025 and USD 12.4 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
China buys along the same lines as the market globally; PIGs first at 24% of 2025 revenue and 19% in 2034, LIDAR fastest at 14.53% on a share moving from 4% to 6%. Its 45% weight in Asia Pacific means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. The full report reports China by technology separately.
Oil and gas pipelines in China sit under the administrative authority of the National Energy Administration, which enforces protection and safety obligations for pipeline operators under national pipeline safety regulations. Monitoring and control equipment supplied into this market generally needs certification under the China Compulsory Certification scheme, and manufacturers align product design with national standards issued through the Standardization Administration of China covering instrumentation, safety integrity and communication protocols used in pipeline supervisory systems. Approval from local energy and work safety bureaus is also commonly required before a monitoring system is commissioned on an operating pipeline, particularly for installations tied to state-owned pipeline networks.
The suppliers tracked in this study (ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG) compete in China across the technology lines above. PIGs, at 24% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and LIDAR, growing at 14.53%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. That makes Asia Pacific a 27% share of 2025 global revenue, USD 4.73 billion rising to USD 12.4 billion, for any supplier deciding where to concentrate.
India
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 3.0×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 20%
- Of global 5.4%
- Revenue $0.94B → $2.85B
5.4% of global revenue is generated in India; USD 0.945 billion in 2025, reaching USD 2.852 billion in 2034, and 20% of Asia Pacific.
Australia
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.4×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 12%
- Of global 3.2%
- Revenue $0.57B → $1.36B
Within Asia Pacific, Australia accounts for 12% of regional revenue and 3.24% of the global total, worth USD 0.567 billion in 2025 and USD 1.364 billion by 2034.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered, holding its share flat through 2034, while revenue still grows 2.3×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 7%
- By 2034 7%
- Revenue $1.23B → $2.80B
Latin America holds 7% of the global pipeline monitoring system market in 2025, worth USD 1.23 billion on the way to USD 2.8 billion by 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fifth by revenue throughout the period.
7% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, and the region keeps growing in absolute terms while others expand faster, a change in relative weight, not a decline in demand.
Within the region the technology split tracks the global one; 24% of 2025 revenue in PIGs, fastest growth of 14.53% in LIDAR. The full report breaks Latin America out along every axis and by country.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 2.2×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 45%
- Of global 3.1%
- Revenue $0.55B → $1.23B
45% of Latin America's base-year revenue comes from Brazil; USD 0.55125 billion, rising to USD 1.232 billion by 2034. 45% of the region in the base year makes it the largest market here without making it the region. Against regional totals of USD 1.23 billion in 2025 and USD 2.8 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
The technology pattern in Brazil is the global one: 24% of 2025 revenue in PIGs, 19% by 2034, against 14.53% growth in LIDAR taking it from 4% to 6%. Since 45% of Latin America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Brazil carries its own technology breakdown in the full report.
Pipeline transport activity in Brazil is licensed and supervised by the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels, known as ANP, which sets technical and safety requirements that pipeline monitoring systems must support, including leak detection and operational reporting obligations placed on operators. Equipment sold into this market separately needs conformity certification from Inmetro, the national metrology and quality body, confirming that instrumentation meets applicable Brazilian technical standards before installation. A supplier typically works through both tracks at once: proving equipment conformity to Inmetro while demonstrating to the operator that the monitoring system satisfies ANP's integrity and reporting framework for the pipeline it serves.
ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG are the suppliers covered in Brazil. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding PIGs at 24% of 2025 revenue, and taking LIDAR while it grows at 14.53%. That makes Latin America a 7% share of 2025 global revenue, USD 1.23 billion rising to USD 2.8 billion, for any supplier deciding where to concentrate.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 2.4×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 35%
- Of global 2.5%
- Revenue $0.43B → $1.01B
Within Latin America, Mexico accounts for 35% of regional revenue and 2.45% of the global total, worth USD 0.42875 billion in 2025 and USD 1.008 billion by 2034.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered — it picks up 1 point of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.4×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 14%
- By 2034 15%
- Revenue $2.45B → $6B
USD 2.45 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Middle East and Africa, 14% of the global pipeline monitoring system market with USD 6 billion projected for 2034. Among the five regions it ranks fourth by revenue in both years.
Share climbs to 15% by 2034, on growth above the market's own 9.61%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
The technology mix reported at global level applies here, with PIGs the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue and LIDAR the fastest-growing at 14.53%. The full report breaks Middle East and Africa out along every axis and by country.
Saudi Arabia
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.4×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 38%
- Of global 5.3%
- Revenue $0.93B → $2.22B
USD 0.931 billion of Middle East and Africa's 2025 revenue is generated in Saudi Arabia, the region's largest market, reaching USD 2.22 billion by 2034. Its 38% of base-year regional revenue leads the region, though enough sits elsewhere that Middle East and Africa is not a proxy for it. Against regional totals of USD 2.45 billion in 2025 and USD 6 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Demand in Saudi Arabia follows the technology mix reported at global level: PIGs is the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue, moving to 19% by 2034, while LIDAR grows fastest at 14.53% and takes its share from 4% to 6%. With 38% of Middle East and Africa concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. Saudi Arabia carries its own technology breakdown in the full report.
Pipeline infrastructure in Saudi Arabia is developed and operated largely by state energy companies, and monitoring systems used on these networks are expected to meet internal engineering standards those operators maintain alongside applicable national codes. Equipment entering the country still needs conformity certification from the Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization, covering electrical safety and product conformity marks required for import and sale. The Ministry of Energy sets broader policy and oversight for pipeline infrastructure across the kingdom, and a supplier is generally expected to show both SASO product certification and compatibility with the technical specifications of the operator whose pipeline the system will monitor.
In Saudi Arabia the field is ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding PIGs at 24% of 2025 revenue, and taking LIDAR while it grows at 14.53%. A supplier weighted toward Middle East and Africa is competing over a base of USD 2.45 billion in 2025 reaching USD 6 billion by 2034, 14% of global revenue at the start of that period.
United Arab Emirates
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.6×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 22%
- Of global 3.1%
- Revenue $0.54B → $1.38B
The United Arab Emirates is sized at USD 0.539 billion in 2025, rising to USD 1.38 billion by 2034; 3.08% of global revenue and 22% of Middle East and Africa. It is reported separately from Saudi Arabia across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Qatar
3rd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.6×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15%
- Of global 2.1%
- Revenue $0.37B → $0.96B
2.1% of global revenue is generated in Qatar; USD 0.3675 billion in 2025, reaching USD 0.96 billion in 2034, and 15% of Middle East and Africa.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by technology, pipe type, application, industry vertical, component, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Suppliers Compete on PIGs Volume and LIDAR Momentum
The study covers ten suppliers: ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE and Siemens AG.
The competitive line that matters is the technology one, not the geographic one. The largest block of revenue is PIGs: USD 4.2 billion in 2025 at 24% of the total, 19% in 2034. Incumbency there is expensive to challenge. LIDAR, compounding at 14.53% against 6.77% for PIGs, is where share changes hands over the forecast period. The two rarely sit with the same supplier, and that is the reason a USD 17.5 billion market is not already consolidated.
What separates suppliers here is breadth of sensing technology paired with field-service reach, not price alone. Diversified automation majors compete on bundling monitoring hardware with the plant-wide control systems they already sell into, backed by established service networks that reach pipeline operators worldwide. Inline-inspection and leak-detection specialists compete on depth: a narrower technology base refined over many pipeline runs, visible in inspection accuracy more than in product breadth. Regional and communications-adjacent suppliers compete on reach into remote pipeline corridors, where satellite or telecom connectivity determines whether a system can report back at all, not sensing quality.
Geographic reach is the other axis of competition. North America alone accounts for 32% of 2025 revenue, so a supplier absent there is absent from the largest part of the market whatever its position elsewhere; Asia Pacific adds a further 27%.
Company-level profiles, financials, shares and development histories are held in the full report and not in this summary.
List of Key Pipeline Monitoring System Market Companies Profiled
10 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- ABB Ltd.(Switzerland)
- Emerson Electric Co.(United States)
- Generic Electric Co.(United States)
- Honeywell International Inc.(United States)
- Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd.(China)
- ORBCOMM Inc.(United States)
- QinetiQ Group Plc(United Kingdom)
- Rockwell Automation Inc.(United States)
- Schneider Electric SE(France)
- Siemens AG(Germany)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Technology, Pipe Type, Application, Industry Vertical, Component), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 10 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Overview, By Technology, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Overview, By Pipe Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Overview, By Industry Vertical, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Overview, By Component, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Pipeline Monitoring System Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Pipeline Monitoring System Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Pipeline Monitoring System Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Pipeline Monitoring System Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Pipeline Monitoring System Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Pipeline Monitoring System Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Technology
9- 01PIGs
- 02Smart Ball
- 03Acoustic/Ultrasonic
- 04Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology
- 05Fiber Optic Technology
- 06Mass Volume/Balance
- 07LIDAR
- 08Vapor Sensing
- 09Others
By Pipe Type
3- 01Metallic
- 02Non-metallic
- 03Others
By Application
4- 01Leak Detection
- 02Operating Condition
- 03Pipeline Break Detection
- 04Others
By Industry Vertical
3- 01Oil & Gas
- 02Water & Wastewater
- 03Others
By Component
3- 01Hardware
- 02Software
- 03Services
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Technology. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
Built upward from unit volumes: installed base of monitoring systems per pipeline kilometer (inline inspection runs, fixed sensor stations, fiber optic cable length deployed) multiplied by realized average selling prices for each technology category (PIGs run fees, acoustic and fiber sensing system prices per kilometer, magnetic flux leakage tool day rates). This build was then checked against oil and gas midstream capital-expenditure disclosures and against monitoring-specific product-line revenue reported by companies such as Emerson, Honeywell and Siemens within their process-automation segments. Where the bottom-up build disagreed with disclosed revenue, the correction was made to the unit-volume or price assumption feeding the build, not by averaging the two figures together.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Interviews target pipeline operators' integrity and asset-management engineers, procurement leads at oil and gas midstream companies and water utilities, and channel partners who install and service monitoring hardware in the field. Sampling weights North America and the Middle East, where transmission pipeline density and integrity-program budgets are largest, alongside Asia Pacific procurement contacts overseeing new pipeline capacity additions. Regulatory contacts at pipeline safety agencies are also sampled to confirm which monitoring technologies a given jurisdiction currently mandates or is moving toward mandating.
Desk research draws on pipeline incident and mileage data published by regulators such as the U.S. PHMSA pipeline safety database, customs trade codes covering inline inspection tools and fiber optic sensing cable, corporate filings from process-automation suppliers reporting a monitoring or asset-performance product line, industry-body pipeline mileage benchmarks published by bodies such as the American Petroleum Institute and the International Pipeline and Offshore Contractors Association, and safety-incident registers maintained by equivalent regulators in the European Union and Gulf Cooperation Council states.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from projected pipeline capacity additions in Asia Pacific and the Middle East, the pace at which fiber optic and acoustic sensing are retrofit onto existing metallic pipeline networks, and water utilities' budgets for cutting non-revenue water losses. Pricing is assumed to decline modestly per unit as sensing hardware scales while software and analytics pricing holds firmer. The forecast treats the 2020 capital-expenditure pullback as a one-time trough, not a permanent reset to a lower base. For the forecast to hold, regulatory pressure on leak detection needs to keep tightening instead of leveling off.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Outputs were back-tested against recorded 2020-2024 growth in inline inspection and leak-detection spend to confirm the build reproduces the historical trend before being extended forward. Segment-level share shifts, particularly fiber optic's rising share and PIGs' declining one, were reviewed against which technology buyers are actually specifying on new tenders. Sensitivities were tested against a slower Asia Pacific pipeline buildout and against a scenario where water utility budgets are deferred, to confirm the forecast does not depend on a single region or vertical holding its assumed pace.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmer for the oil and gas vertical and for established technologies such as PIGs, magnetic flux leakage and acoustic sensing, where company disclosures and regulatory mileage data both exist. It is thinner for the water and wastewater vertical and for newer technologies such as LIDAR-based right-of-way monitoring, where adoption is still forming and reporting stays sparse. A sustained oil-price downturn that delays midstream capital spending broadly is the structural risk most likely to force a revision, since oil and gas remains the largest single vertical underpinning the forecast.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Pipeline Monitoring System Market projected to reach?
USD 40 Billion by 2034, CAGR 9.61%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 32% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
PIGs is the largest line by technology, at 24% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
ABB Ltd., Emerson Electric Co., Generic Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., QinetiQ Group Plc, Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.