Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By TypeBy ApplicationBy Storage TypeBy Mode of TransportationBy End User
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Type (Pipe Lines, Marine Vessels & Platforms, Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas, Oilfield Tools), By Application (Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products, Natural Gas, Liquefied Natural Gas), By Storage Type (Aboveground Storage Tanks, Underground / Cavern Storage, Floating Storage), By Mode of Transportation (Pipeline, Marine Tankers, Rail & Road Tankers), By End User (National Oil Companies, Independent E&P and Midstream Operators, Utilities & Distribution Companies), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Full table of contents for the published report, chapter by chapter.
- 01By TypePipe Lines · Marine Vessels & Platforms · Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas
- 02By ApplicationCrude Oil · Refined Petroleum Products · Natural Gas
- 03By Storage TypeAboveground Storage Tanks · Underground / Cavern Storage · Floating Storage
- 04By Mode of TransportationPipeline · Marine Tankers · Rail & Road Tankers
- 05By End UserNational Oil Companies · Independent E&P and Midstream Operators · Utilities & Distribution Companies
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
The oil and gas storage and transportation market covers the tanks, pipelines, marine vessels, terminals and associated instrumentation used to hold and move crude oil, refined petroleum products, natural gas and liquefied natural gas between production sites, processing facilities and end markets. It spans fixed infrastructure such as storage tanks, underground caverns and pipeline networks alongside mobile assets like tankers, barges and rail and road tank cars. Buyers include national and independent oil and gas producers, midstream operators, refiners, utilities and government strategic reserve agencies that need to store and transport hydrocarbons safely and reliably.
USD 68 billion of revenue was recorded in the global oil and gas storage and transportation market in 2025. By 2034 the figure reaches USD 100.4 billion, a compound annual growth rate of 4.39% through the forecast period, along a series that runs USD 52 billion in 2020, USD 64.8 billion in 2024, USD 71.2 billion in 2026 and USD 85 billion in 2030.
The type mix shifts over the period. Pipe Lines is the largest line in 2025 at USD 28.95 billion, a 42.57% share, moving to USD 40.16 billion and 40% by 2034. Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas grows fastest at 6.52%, taking its share from 19.15% to 23%, while Oilfield Tools grows slowest at 2.14%. Marine Vessels & Platforms and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas take share over the period; Pipe Lines and Oilfield Tools give it up while still growing in absolute terms.
Cut by application, the largest line is Crude Oil: 45% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 30.6 billion, and 41% at USD 41.16 billion by 2034. Liquefied Natural Gas grows faster at 10.53% against 3.35%, moving from 9% of revenue to 15% by 2034. Both this axis and the type one divide the same revenue, which is why they are alternative views, not components.
Asia Pacific is the largest region at 34.5% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 23.46 billion and reaching USD 39.16 billion by 2034. North America follows at 25.93%, moving from USD 17.63 billion to USD 24.1 billion, and Latin America is the smallest at 9.64%. Asia Pacific and Middle East and Africa gain share across the period, so growth is not distributed evenly between regions.
Coverage extends to five regions, four type lines and five segmentation axes over the full fifteen years. The 2025 total itself is arrived at by triangulating published aggregates against category proxies, not by an independent count, and the splits below are estimated on that same basis, a bound on their precision worth carrying into any use of them.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- The global oil and gas storage and transportation market moves from USD 52 billion in 2020 to USD 68 billion in 2025 and USD 100.4 billion by 2034, the forecast period compounding at 4.39% a year.
- Pipe Lines is the largest type line at USD 28.95 billion in 2025, a 42.57% share, reaching USD 40.16 billion and 40% of revenue by 2034.
- Fastest growth on the type axis belongs to Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas: 6.52% a year, USD 13.02 billion to USD 23.09 billion, and a share moving from 19.15% to 23%.
- Against a base case of USD 100.4 billion in 2034, the study also reports a bear case at USD 93.87 billion and a bull case at USD 106.93 billion, with the assumptions behind each set out separately.
- The largest region is Asia Pacific, generating USD 23.46 billion in 2025 (34.5% of the global total) and USD 39.16 billion by 2034, ahead of North America at 25.93%.
- 45.01% of Asia Pacific's base-year revenue comes from China alone: USD 10.56 billion in 2025, rising to USD 17.23 billion by 2034, which is why it is that region's worked example.
- The study covers 2020 through 2034 with 2025 as the base year, reporting five regions and five segmentation axes separately, with revenue, share and a growth rate for every line in each year.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By By Type
Base year 2025Pipe Lines leads with 42.6% of by type segment revenue.
Share of by type segment revenue, most recent base year.
The global oil and gas storage and transportation market is shaped over 2026-2034 by three measurable movements: a change in the type mix, a shift in where revenue sits geographically, and the 4.39% rate carrying the total.
Not one of them points downward. Growth is everywhere in absolute terms, and the interest is entirely in where it lands.
Composition shifts on the type axis. 6.52% against 2.14%: that gap, between Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas and Oilfield Tools, is the largest on the type axis. Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas takes its share of revenue from 19.15% to 23% while Oilfield Tools gives up ground, from 14.57% to 12%. Neither contracts: USD 13.02 billion becomes USD 23.09 billion, USD 9.91 billion becomes USD 12.05 billion. What the spread decides is which of them a supplier's revenue is exposed to.
The regional balance moves. Asia Pacific moves from 34.5% of revenue in 2025 to 39% in 2034, worth USD 23.46 billion rising to USD 39.16 billion; Middle East and Africa moves from 10.36% of revenue in 2025 to 11% in 2034, worth USD 7.04 billion rising to USD 11.04 billion. Against that, North America at 25.93% moving to 24%, Europe at 19.57% moving to 17%, Latin America at 9.64% moving to 9%, a fall in share, not in revenue. Revenue added in this market is therefore concentrating geographically instead of spreading evenly, and a participant weighted toward a share-losing region grows more slowly than the market even while its own revenue climbs.
The series never breaks trajectory. The market moves through USD 52 billion in 2020, USD 64.8 billion in 2024, USD 68 billion in 2025, USD 71.2 billion in 2026, USD 85 billion in 2030 and USD 100.4 billion in 2034. No year breaks the trajectory, and the 4.39% forecast rate compares with 5.51% recorded over 2020-2025, a continuation, not an inflection. That moves the planning question away from timing a turn and onto the type and regional mixes, where the actual movement is.
Market Growth Factors
Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas adds the most incremental growth
At 6.52% against a market rate of 4.39%, Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas is the line pulling the average up: USD 13.02 billion to USD 23.09 billion, and 19.15% of revenue to 23%. Because the spread to Oilfield Tools at 2.14% is this wide, the headline 4.39% is a weighted result, not a rate any single line achieves. That makes position on the type axis a growth decision, not a product one.
- 02Regional weight, not regional count
The largest regional base is Asia Pacific: USD 23.46 billion in 2025 at 34.5% of the global total, USD 39.16 billion by 2034 and 39%. North America adds a further 25.93% at USD 17.63 billion, reaching USD 24.1 billion. Most of the base and most of the growth sit in those two, and a plan spread evenly across regions therefore over-invests outside them.
- 03A demonstrated trajectory, not a projected turnaround
Revenue rose through USD 52 billion in 2020, USD 64.8 billion in 2024 and USD 68 billion in 2025, a compound 5.51% across the historical period. The forecast period then runs at 4.39%, ending 2034 at USD 100.4 billion. A forecast extending an observed trend is a different proposition from one proposing a turn, and that is why no ramp is applied: the 4.39% runs evenly across the period.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rising global crude and refined product trade volumes | High | +12 | High | High | Medium |
| 2 | LNG export capacity expansion and new liquefaction and regasification terminals | High | +9.5 | Medium | High | High |
| 3 | Pipeline network expansion and replacement across producing and consuming basins | Medium-High | +6.8 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 4 | Digitalization and automation of storage and pipeline monitoring | Medium | +3.2 | Low | Medium | Medium |
| 5 | Strategic petroleum reserve builds and government inventory buffering | Low | +2.4 | Medium | Low | Low |
| 6 | Others | Low | +1.1 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +35 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Decarbonization policy and long-term oil demand plateau risk | Medium-High | −1.6 | Low | Medium | Medium |
| 2 | Permitting delays and community opposition to new pipeline and terminal construction | Medium | −0.7 | Medium | Low | Low |
| 3 | Volatile crude prices compressing capital spending on new storage capacity | Low | −0.3 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | −2.6 | |||||
Drivers contribute 35 Billion and restraints remove 2.6 Billion, a net 32.4 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Growth in the global oil and gas storage and transportation market comes from three measurable sources over 2026-2034: the market's own compounding at 4.39%, the share gained by faster-growing type lines, and expansion in the regions taking a larger part of global revenue.
Restraining Factors
Downside case: USD 93.87 billion by 2034, against USD 100.4 billion in the base case
Market Restraints
2- 01Downside case: USD 93.87 billion by 2034, against USD 100.4 billion in the base case
Bear case assumes an accelerated shift toward electrification and alternative fuels compresses refined-product and crude storage demand, while permitting delays slow new pipeline and terminal capacity. On that assumption 2034 revenue lands at USD 93.87 billion against the USD 100.4 billion base case, from the same USD 68 billion 2025 starting point.
- 02The largest line is not the fastest
Pipe Lines carries 42.57% of 2025 revenue at USD 28.95 billion but compounds at 3.67% against 4.39% for the market, taking its share to 40% by 2034 even as revenue rises to USD 40.16 billion. Because it carries that much of the base, its pace holds the blended rate down more than any faster line lifts it.
Market Opportunities
Where the forecast could be beaten
Market Opportunities
2- 01Where the forecast could be beaten
The upside path assumes bull case assumes faster LNG terminal buildout and sustained high seaborne crude and gas trade volumes, with no major disruption to pipeline capital spending. It ends 2034 at USD 106.93 billion against a USD 100.4 billion base case, off the same USD 68 billion base year.
- 02Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas is where share changes hands
Share on the type axis moves toward Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas, from 19.15% in 2025 to 23% in 2034, on 6.52% growth against the market's 4.39% and revenue rising from USD 13.02 billion to USD 23.09 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds Pipe Lines, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
Revenue is concentrated in Pipe Lines
Market Challenges
2- 01Revenue is concentrated in Pipe Lines
Pipe Lines is 42.57% of 2025 revenue at USD 28.95 billion and still 40% at USD 40.16 billion in 2034. A market leaning this heavily on one type line concentrates its exposure there, and a shift in demand for that line moves the total more than any other single change on the axis.
- 02China is 45.01% of Asia Pacific
Of Asia Pacific's USD 23.46 billion in 2025, USD 10.56 billion (45.01%) comes from China alone, rising to USD 17.23 billion by 2034. Regional totals therefore move largely with one country's demand, so a regional forecast is more exposed to single-country conditions than its size alone suggests.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesThe market is divided by type and by application, storage type, mode of transportation and end user; five axes in all. Every one of them divides the same revenue, which makes them views of one market from different commercial angles, not components of it.
There are four lines on the type axis, and all of them grow in revenue between 2025 and 2034. What separates them is share: two gain it, the rest give it up.
By Type · 4 segments
Pipe Lines Led by Type in 2025, with Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas Growing Fastest
- Largest Pipe Lines · 42.6%
- Fastest Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas · 6.5%
- Moves most Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas · +3.9 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipe Lines | $28.95B | 42.6% | $40.16B | 40%-2.6 | 3.7% |
| Marine Vessels & Platforms | $16.12B | 23.7% | $25.10B | 25%+1.3 | 5% |
| Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas | $13.02B | 19.1% | $23.09B | 23%+3.9 | 6.5% |
| Oilfield Tools | $9.91B | 14.6% | $12.05B | 12%-2.6 | 2.1% |
Pipe Lines lead because they form the fixed backbone connecting production fields to refineries and export terminals, a network operators replace only gradually. Control and Instrumentation grows fastest as operators retrofit ageing pipelines and terminals with leak detection, remote monitoring and automation to meet tightening safety and environmental oversight. By 2034 Pipe Lines is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Application · 4 segments
Scale in Crude Oil and Growth in Liquefied Natural Gas Define the Application Axis
- Largest Crude Oil · 45%
- Fastest Liquefied Natural Gas · 10.5%
- Moves most Liquefied Natural Gas · +6 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Oil | $30.60B | 45% | $41.16B | 41%-4 | 3.4% |
| Refined Petroleum Products | $19.04B | 28% | $25.10B | 25%-3 | 3.1% |
| Natural Gas | $12.24B | 18% | $19.08B | 19%+1 | 5% |
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $6.12B | 9% | $15.06B | 15%+6 | 10.5% |
Crude Oil dominates because upstream production still moves overwhelmingly through dedicated pipeline and tanker networks built around established trade routes. Liquefied Natural Gas grows fastest as new export terminals and long-term supply contracts open markets that pipeline gas cannot reach, pulling incremental storage and shipping capacity toward liquefaction and regasification infrastructure. The order does not change: Crude Oil is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds.
By Storage Type · 3 segments
Aboveground Storage Tanks Held the Dominant Share of the Storage type Segment in 2025
- Largest Aboveground Storage Tanks · 62%
- Fastest Floating Storage · 7%
- Moves most Aboveground Storage Tanks · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aboveground Storage Tanks | $42.16B | 62% | $58.23B | 58%-4 | 3.6% |
| Underground / Cavern Storage | $17.68B | 26% | $27.11B | 27%+1 | 4.9% |
| Floating Storage | $8.16B | 12% | $15.06B | 15%+3 | 7% |
Aboveground Storage Tanks lead because they are cheaper to build, easier to inspect and suit the vast majority of terminal and refinery sites. Floating Storage grows fastest as offshore production and ship-to-ship transfer operations expand in regions where onshore land or permitting constraints make new tank farms impractical. Aboveground Storage Tanks remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
By Mode of Transportation · 3 segments
Pipeline Led by Mode of transportation in 2025, with Rail & Road Tankers Growing Fastest
- Largest Pipeline · 55%
- Fastest Rail & Road Tankers · 5.3%
- Moves most Pipeline · -3 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline | $37.40B | 55% | $52.21B | 52%-3 | 3.8% |
| Marine Tankers | $21.76B | 32% | $34.14B | 34%+2 | 5.1% |
| Rail & Road Tankers | $8.84B | 13% | $14.06B | 14%+1 | 5.3% |
Pipeline leads because it remains the lowest-cost way to move large, continuous volumes over land once a corridor is built and permitted. Marine Tankers grow fastest as seaborne crude and LNG trade lengthens the average voyage distance between producing and consuming regions, adding demand for tanker and floating-storage capacity. By 2034 Pipeline is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
By End User · 3 segments
National Oil Companies (NOCs) Held the Dominant Share of the End user Segment in 2025
- Largest National Oil Companies (NOCs) · 48%
- Fastest Utilities & Distribution Companies · 5.9%
- Moves most National Oil Companies (NOCs) · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Oil Companies (NOCs) | $32.64B | 48% | $44.18B | 44%-4 | 3.4% |
| Independent E&P and Midstream Operators | $25.16B | 37% | $39.16B | 39%+2 | 5% |
| Utilities & Distribution Companies | $10.20B | 15% | $17.07B | 17%+2 | 5.9% |
National Oil Companies lead because they control the bulk of upstream production and the storage and export infrastructure built around it in most producing countries. Utilities and Distribution Companies grow fastest as gas-fired power and city-gas distribution networks expand, requiring new local storage and last-mile transport capacity. By 2034 National Oil Companies (NOCs) is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered — 1.9 points of share move elsewhere by 2034.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 25.9%
- By 2034 24%
- Revenue $17.63B → $24.10B
25.93% of the global oil and gas storage and transportation market sits in North America in 2025, worth USD 17.63 billion and reaches USD 24.1 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits second across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
By 2034 the share stands at 24%, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Pipe Lines the largest line at 42.57% of 2025 revenue and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas the fastest-growing at 6.52%. The full report breaks North America out along every axis and by country.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 75% of it, growing 1.3×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 75%
- Of global 19.4%
- Revenue $13.22B → $17.83B
The United States is the largest market within North America, generating USD 13.22 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 17.83 billion by 2034. Carrying 74.99% of the region in the base year, it sets North America's direction instead of merely contributing to it. Regional revenue of USD 17.63 billion in 2025 and USD 24.1 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
The type pattern in the United States is the global one: 42.57% of 2025 revenue in Pipe Lines, 40% by 2034, against 6.52% growth in Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas taking it from 19.15% to 23%. Its 74.99% weight in North America means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. Revenue by type for the United States is reported separately in the full report.
Oil and gas storage and transportation infrastructure in the United States falls under a layered federal and state regime. Interstate pipelines are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for tariffs and access, while the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, through its Office of Pipeline Safety, sets integrity management, construction, and operating standards for both liquid and gas lines. Storage terminals handling petroleum products must comply with Environmental Protection Agency rules on spill prevention, control, and countermeasure planning, alongside Occupational Safety and Health Administration process safety management requirements. Interstate carriers also register with the Department of Transportation. Suppliers must demonstrate conformity with API and ASME engineering standards, maintain emergency response plans, and secure environmental permits before a facility can be sited or expanded.
The suppliers tracked in this study (Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll) compete in the United States across the type lines above. Pipe Lines, at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas, growing at 6.52%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. The full report covers country-level positioning and shares company by company; this summary does not.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 1.3×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 20%
- Of global 5.2%
- Revenue $3.53B → $4.58B
Within North America, Canada accounts for 20.02% of regional revenue and 5.19% of the global total, worth USD 3.53 billion in 2025 and USD 4.58 billion by 2034.
Europe Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered — 2.6 points of share move elsewhere by 2034.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 19.6%
- By 2034 17%
- Revenue $13.31B → $17.07B
Europe holds 19.57% of the global oil and gas storage and transportation market in 2025, worth USD 13.31 billion and reaches USD 17.07 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits third across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
Its share moves to 17% by 2034, a shift in share, not in direction: revenue climbs every year while the market's centre of gravity moves elsewhere.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Pipe Lines the largest line at 42.57% of 2025 revenue and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas the fastest-growing at 6.52%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Europe sits in the full report.
Netherlands
The largest market in Europe, growing 1.2×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 30%
- Of global 5.9%
- Revenue $3.99B → $4.95B
USD 3.99 billion of Europe's 2025 revenue is generated in the Netherlands, the region's largest market, reaching USD 4.95 billion by 2034. It accounts for 29.98% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Regional revenue of USD 13.31 billion in 2025 and USD 17.07 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is Pipe Lines at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, easing to 40% by 2034, and the fastest is Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas at 6.52%, from 19.15% to 23%. Since 29.98% of Europe's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Revenue by type for the Netherlands is reported separately in the full report.
Storage and transportation of oil and gas in the Netherlands operates under national implementation of European Union energy and environmental law, administered principally by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management alongside the Dutch Emissions Authority. Facility operators must obtain an environmental permit under the Environmental Management Act, covering site safety, emissions control, and spill containment, and major storage sites fall within the scope of the Seveso framework governing hazardous substances. Pipeline operators coordinate with Gasunie and the national grid authority on technical and safety codes aligned with European standards. Suppliers are expected to maintain certified tank integrity inspections, follow ADR rules for transport by road where applicable, and report emissions and incidents to the competent regional authority.
In the Netherlands the field is Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding Pipe Lines at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, and taking Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas while it grows at 6.52%. The commercial size of that position is USD 13.31 billion in 2025 and USD 17.07 billion by 2034, 19.57% of the global total in the base year.
Germany
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 1.2×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 25%
- Of global 4.9%
- Revenue $3.33B → $4.10B
Germany is sized at USD 3.33 billion in 2025, rising to USD 4.1 billion by 2034; 4.9% of global revenue and 25.02% of Europe. It is reported separately from the Netherlands across every segmentation axis in the full report.
United Kingdom
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 1.2×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 18%
- Of global 3.5%
- Revenue $2.40B → $2.90B
The United Kingdom is sized at USD 2.4 billion in 2025, rising to USD 2.9 billion by 2034; 3.53% of global revenue and 18.03% of Europe. It is reported separately from the Netherlands across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 4.5 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.7×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 34.5%
- By 2034 39%
- Revenue $23.46B → $39.16B
In Asia Pacific, 34.5% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 23.46 billion rising to USD 39.16 billion in 2034. That makes it the first-largest region covered, in 2025 and again in 2034.
Share climbs to 39% by 2034, so the region grows faster than the market's 4.39% and takes a larger part of the revenue added by 2034 than its 2025 weight implies.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Pipe Lines the largest line at 42.57% of 2025 revenue and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas the fastest-growing at 6.52%. Asia Pacific is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 1.6×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 45%
- Of global 15.5%
- Revenue $10.56B → $17.23B
The largest single market in Asia Pacific is China, at USD 10.56 billion in 2025 and USD 17.23 billion in 2034. Its 45.01% of base-year regional revenue leads the region, though enough sits elsewhere that Asia Pacific is not a proxy for it. Regional revenue of USD 23.46 billion in 2025 and USD 39.16 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
The type pattern in China is the global one: 42.57% of 2025 revenue in Pipe Lines, 40% by 2034, against 6.52% growth in Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas taking it from 19.15% to 23%. Its 45.01% weight in Asia Pacific means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. The full report reports China by type separately.
Regulation of oil and gas storage and transportation in China rests with the National Energy Administration for sector planning and pipeline access, working alongside the Ministry of Emergency Management, which oversees hazardous chemical storage safety, and the Ministry of Ecology and Environment for pollution control. Pipeline construction and operation must follow national standards issued under the Guobiao system, covering material specification, welding, and leak detection. Storage facility operators are required to obtain a safety production license, conduct hazard identification assessments, and register bulk storage tanks with local emergency management bureaus. Cross-border and coastal transport activities additionally fall under maritime safety administration oversight. Suppliers must maintain documented inspection and maintenance records to retain their operating licenses.
The suppliers tracked in this study (Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll) compete in China across the type lines above. Volume sits in Pipe Lines at 42.57% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas at 6.52% growth. That makes Asia Pacific a 34.5% share of 2025 global revenue, USD 23.46 billion rising to USD 39.16 billion, for any supplier deciding where to concentrate.
India
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 1.8×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 20%
- Of global 6.9%
- Revenue $4.69B → $8.62B
Within Asia Pacific, India accounts for 19.99% of regional revenue and 6.9% of the global total, worth USD 4.69 billion in 2025 and USD 8.62 billion by 2034.
Japan
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 1.6×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15%
- Of global 5.2%
- Revenue $3.52B → $5.48B
Within Asia Pacific, Japan accounts for 15% of regional revenue and 5.18% of the global total, worth USD 3.52 billion in 2025 and USD 5.48 billion by 2034.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered — 0.6 points of share move elsewhere by 2034.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 9.6%
- By 2034 9%
- Revenue $6.56B → $9.04B
USD 6.56 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Latin America, 9.64% of the global oil and gas storage and transportation market with USD 9.04 billion projected for 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fifth by revenue throughout the period.
By 2034 the share stands at 9%, though revenue still rises throughout; the shift is in the region's weight against faster-growing ones, which is not the same as weakening demand.
Pipe Lines leads here as it does globally, at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas again grows fastest at 6.52%. Latin America is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 1.3×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 45%
- Of global 4.3%
- Revenue $2.95B → $3.98B
44.97% of Latin America's base-year revenue comes from Brazil; USD 2.95 billion, rising to USD 3.98 billion by 2034. It accounts for 44.97% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Against regional totals of USD 6.56 billion in 2025 and USD 9.04 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Brazil buys along the same lines as the market globally; Pipe Lines first at 42.57% of 2025 revenue and 40% in 2034, Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas fastest at 6.52% on a share moving from 19.15% to 23%. Since 44.97% of Latin America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Brazil carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
In Brazil, the storage and transportation of oil and gas products is regulated by the Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis, which authorizes pipeline operation, bulk terminal activity, and product specification conformity. Environmental licensing is administered by IBAMA or the corresponding state environmental agency, covering site impact assessment and spill contingency planning before construction can proceed. Fire and workplace safety requirements fall under state civil defense and labor inspection bodies, which enforce tank farm and hazardous material handling codes. Suppliers must register facilities with the regulator, comply with ABNT technical standards for equipment and materials, and maintain valid operating authorizations. Maritime and port-based transport is additionally subject to oversight by the national waterway transport authority.
In Brazil the field is Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding Pipe Lines at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, and taking Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas while it grows at 6.52%. A supplier weighted toward Latin America is competing over a base of USD 6.56 billion in 2025 reaching USD 9.04 billion by 2034, 9.64% of global revenue at the start of that period.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 1.3×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 30%
- Of global 2.9%
- Revenue $1.97B → $2.62B
Mexico is sized at USD 1.97 billion in 2025, rising to USD 2.62 billion by 2034; 2.9% of global revenue and 30.03% of Latin America. It is reported separately from Brazil across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.6 points of share by 2034.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 10.4%
- By 2034 11%
- Revenue $7.04B → $11.04B
10.36% of the global oil and gas storage and transportation market sits in Middle East and Africa in 2025, worth USD 7.04 billion and reaches USD 11.04 billion by 2034. That makes it the fourth-largest region covered, in 2025 and again in 2034.
11% of global revenue sits here by 2034, up from the 2025 level, on growth above the market's own 4.39%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Pipe Lines largest at 42.57% of 2025 revenue, Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas fastest at 6.52%. Revenue for Middle East and Africa is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Saudi Arabia
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.5×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 40.1%
- Of global 4.2%
- Revenue $2.82B → $4.31B
The largest single market in Middle East and Africa is Saudi Arabia, at USD 2.82 billion in 2025 and USD 4.31 billion in 2034. At 40.06% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated in other markets. Against regional totals of USD 7.04 billion in 2025 and USD 11.04 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Saudi Arabia buys along the same lines as the market globally; Pipe Lines first at 42.57% of 2025 revenue and 40% in 2034, Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas fastest at 6.52% on a share moving from 19.15% to 23%. With 40.06% of Middle East and Africa concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. The full report reports Saudi Arabia by type separately.
Oil and gas storage and transportation in Saudi Arabia is governed primarily through the Ministry of Energy, which sets sector policy and licensing conditions, with technical and safety oversight exercised by the Saudi Aramco engineering standards framework that many domestic operators are required to follow for pipeline and terminal design. The Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization issues conformity requirements for storage equipment and materials, while the General Authority of Civil Defense enforces fire safety and hazardous substance handling rules at storage sites. Environmental permitting falls under the National Center for Environmental Compliance, which reviews spill prevention and emissions controls. Suppliers must secure the relevant operating licenses, meet designated engineering codes, and pass periodic safety inspections to maintain authorization.
Competition in Saudi Arabia runs between the suppliers this study tracks: Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll. Volume sits in Pipe Lines at 42.57% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas at 6.52% growth. That makes Middle East and Africa a 10.36% share of 2025 global revenue, USD 7.04 billion rising to USD 11.04 billion, for any supplier deciding where to concentrate.
United Arab Emirates
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.6×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 25%
- Of global 2.6%
- Revenue $1.76B → $2.87B
Within Middle East and Africa, the United Arab Emirates accounts for 25% of regional revenue and 2.59% of the global total, worth USD 1.76 billion in 2025 and USD 2.87 billion by 2034.
Nigeria
3rd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.7×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15.1%
- Of global 1.6%
- Revenue $1.06B → $1.77B
Within Middle East and Africa, Nigeria accounts for 15.06% of regional revenue and 1.56% of the global total, worth USD 1.06 billion in 2025 and USD 1.77 billion by 2034.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Type, Application, Storage Type, Mode of Transportation, End User, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Suppliers Compete on Pipe Lines Volume and Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas Momentum
Suppliers in scope: Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking and Ramboll.
Where suppliers actually compete is along the type axis. The largest block of revenue is Pipe Lines: USD 28.95 billion in 2025 at 42.57% of the total, 40% in 2034. Incumbency there is expensive to challenge. Movement is concentrated in Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas; 6.52% growth, against 2.14% at the other end of the axis in Oilfield Tools. The two rarely sit with the same supplier, and that is the reason a USD 68 billion market is not already consolidated.
Scale in storage and transportation is built around asset ownership and network reach rather than product differentiation. Operators with extensive pipeline mileage, terminal capacity and marine fleets can offer shippers single-window access across multiple basins and trade routes; smaller players cannot match that reach. Regulatory and safety track record matters heavily, since new pipeline and terminal permits increasingly depend on demonstrated environmental and incident-response performance. Long-term throughput and capacity contracts with producers and refiners lock in volume and favor incumbents with existing connections. Regional and independent operators compete on flexibility, faster permitting in underserved basins and lower-cost service for shorter-haul or smaller-volume customers that large integrated networks do not prioritize.
Presence matters unevenly by region. With 34.5% of 2025 revenue in Asia Pacific and 25.93% in North America, a supplier's coverage of those two decides most of its addressable base before any product question arises.
Company-level profiles, financials, shares and development histories are held in the full report and not in this summary.
List of Key Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Companies Profiled
18 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- Royal Vopak(Netherlands)
- GDF SUEZ(France)
- Buckeye(United States)
- Vitol Group(Switzerland)
- Amec Foster Wheeler(United Kingdom)
- Magellan Midstream(United States)
- WorleyParsons(Australia)
- Niska Gas Storage(Canada)
- Centrica(United Kingdom)
- CIM-CCMP
- CLH(Spain)
- DaLian Port(China)
- HORIZON TERMINALS(United Arab Emirates)
- Kinder Morgan(United States)
- NuStar Energy(United States)
- Odfjell(Norway)
- Oiltanking(Germany)
- Ramboll(Denmark)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Type, Application, Storage Type, Mode of Transportation, End User), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 18 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Overview, By Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Overview, By Storage Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Overview, By Mode of Transportation, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Overview, By End User, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Type
4- 01Pipe Lines
- 02Marine Vessels & Platforms
- 03Control & Instrumentation - Oil & Gas
- 04Oilfield Tools
By Application
4- 01Crude Oil
- 02Refined Petroleum Products
- 03Natural Gas
- 04Liquefied Natural Gas
By Storage Type
3- 01Aboveground Storage Tanks
- 02Underground / Cavern Storage
- 03Floating Storage
By Mode of Transportation
3- 01Pipeline
- 02Marine Tankers
- 03Rail & Road Tankers
By End User
3- 01National Oil Companies (NOCs)
- 02Independent E&P and Midstream Operators
- 03Utilities & Distribution Companies
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Type. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
Market size was built upward from unit volumes and realised prices rather than derived top-down. The base layer combines global pipeline throughput and mileage additions, storage tank and terminal capacity in barrels, marine tanker and FSO fleet capacity, and average day-rates or tariff levels charged per barrel or cubic meter handled across crude oil, refined products, natural gas and LNG. These volumes are drawn from throughput data for major pipeline corridors, terminal capacity registers and tanker fleet trackers, then multiplied by prevailing tariff and lease-rate benchmarks to build revenue by segment. The resulting bottom-up total is checked against disclosed revenue from major midstream and terminal operators; where the two diverge, the correction is made to the underlying volume or tariff assumption feeding the bottom-up build, not by averaging in the company-disclosed figure.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Interviews target commercial and business-development leads at pipeline and terminal operators, procurement and logistics managers at refiners and national oil companies, terminal and marine operations managers who set day-to-day capacity utilisation, and regulatory affairs contacts who track permitting timelines for new pipeline and storage capacity. Sampling weights toward North America and the Middle East, where the largest pipeline networks and export terminals are concentrated, and toward Asia Pacific, where new LNG receiving and storage capacity is being added fastest. Contacts in Europe focus on the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp storage and trading hub, given its role in setting regional tariff benchmarks for the wider market.
Desk research draws on pipeline mileage and throughput data published by national energy regulators, tanker and FSO fleet registers tracked by classification societies, terminal storage capacity listings maintained by industry associations, and customs and trade data reported under Harmonized System codes covering crude oil, refined products and LNG cargoes. Government strategic petroleum reserve disclosures and inventory reports from national statistical agencies inform the government-held storage component. Import and export terminal permit filings, where public, cross-check announced capacity additions against what has actually been commissioned, since announced project timelines for pipeline and terminal capacity routinely slip.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from projected crude, refined-product and natural gas trade volumes, planned pipeline and terminal capacity additions already under construction or sanctioned, and the pace of LNG liquefaction and regasification terminal commissioning through 2034. Tariff and lease-rate assumptions hold roughly flat in real terms except where new capacity additions are expected to ease a regional bottleneck and compress rates. The approach normalises for the temporary 2020 to 2021 storage demand spike tied to contango-driven inventory building, treating it as a one-off rather than a trend. For the forecast to hold, sanctioned pipeline and LNG terminal projects must be commissioned close to their announced schedules.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Outputs were back-tested against recorded pipeline throughput and terminal capacity growth over 2020 to 2024 to confirm the historical build reproduces observed trends before being extended forward. Segment-level share shifts, including the move toward LNG and marine transportation, were reviewed against known project pipelines for liquefaction and regasification capacity to confirm the shift is supported by capacity actually under construction rather than announced intentions alone. Sensitivities were tested against a slower LNG project commissioning schedule and against a scenario where pipeline permitting delays push announced capacity additions two to three years later than currently scheduled.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmest for pipeline and marine transportation volumes in North America, Europe and the Middle East, where throughput and capacity data are published regularly and consistently. It is thinner for underground and cavern storage capacity in Asia Pacific and for government strategic reserve levels in several producing countries, where disclosure is partial or delayed. The clearest risk to this estimate is a faster shift away from crude oil transportation as demand plateaus in mature markets, which would require revising the crude oil application segment down independent of any change to the natural gas and LNG segments.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Oil And Gas Storage And Transportation Market projected to reach?
USD 100.4 Billion by 2034, CAGR 4.39%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
Asia Pacific leads with 34.5% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
Pipe Lines is the largest line by Type, at 42.57% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
Royal Vopak, GDF SUEZ, Buckeye, Vitol Group, Amec Foster Wheeler, Magellan Midstream, WorleyParsons, Niska Gas Storage, Centrica, CIM-CCMP, CLH, DaLian Port, HORIZON TERMINALS, Kinder Morgan, NuStar Energy, Odfjell, Oiltanking, Ramboll. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.