Medical Coding MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By ComponentBy Classification SystemBy Deployment ModeBy End UserBy Specialty/application
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Medical Coding Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Component (Outsourced Coding Services, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, Coding Audit and Compliance Services, Coding Training and Certification Services), By Classification System (ICD-10-CM, CPT, HCPCS Level II, Other Classification Systems), By Deployment Mode (Offshore, Onshore, Nearshore), By End User (Hospitals, Physician Practices and Clinics, Diagnostic and Imaging Centers, Payers and Health Insurance Companies, Ambulatory Surgical Centers), By Specialty/application (General and Primary Care, Radiology, Cardiology, Oncology, Other Specialties), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Market outlook, key takeaways, drivers and challenges for the report period.
- 01By ComponentOutsourced Coding Services · Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding · Coding Audit and Compliance Services
- 02By Classification SystemICD-10-CM · CPT · HCPCS Level II
- 03By Deployment ModeOffshore · Onshore · Nearshore
- 04By End UserHospitals · Physician Practices and Clinics · Diagnostic and Imaging Centers
- 05By Specialty/applicationGeneral and Primary Care · Radiology · Cardiology
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
Medical coding is the process of translating clinical documentation, diagnoses, procedures and services rendered during a patient encounter into standardized alphanumeric codes such as ICD, CPT and HCPCS, which providers submit to payers to support billing, reimbursement and regulatory reporting. The market covers the services, software and quality-review activities that support this translation, delivered either by in-house hospital and clinic staff or by dedicated coding vendors operating onshore, nearshore or offshore. Buyers include hospitals, physician practices, diagnostic centers, ambulatory surgical centers and health insurance payers, each of which depends on accurate, compliant coding to secure timely reimbursement and avoid claim denials or audit exposure.
USD 26 billion of revenue was recorded in the global medical coding market in 2025. By 2034 the figure reaches USD 55 billion, a compound annual growth rate of 8.71% through the forecast period, along a series that runs USD 15.5 billion in 2020, USD 24.2 billion in 2024, USD 28.2 billion in 2026 and USD 39.6 billion in 2030.
52% of 2025 revenue sits in Outsourced Coding Services, worth USD 13.52 billion and rising to USD 24.2 billion at 44% by 2034, the largest component line in both years. Growth is fastest in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions at 12.18% and slowest in Coding Training and Certification Services at 6.51%. Share moves toward Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions and away from Outsourced Coding Services, Coding Audit and Compliance Services and Coding Training and Certification Services, though no line shrinks in revenue terms.
The classification system split puts ICD-10-CM first, at USD 10.92 billion and 42% of revenue in 2025, rising to USD 20.9 billion and 38% in 2034. Other Classification Systems (ICD-11 and DRG) grows faster at 14.5% against 7.48%, moving from 5% of revenue to 8% by 2034. It cuts the same total as the component axis from a different commercial angle, so revenue does not add across the two.
North America is the largest region at 46% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 11.96 billion and reaching USD 23.1 billion by 2034. Asia Pacific follows at 24%, moving from USD 6.24 billion to USD 15.4 billion, and Middle East and Africa is the smallest at 4%. Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa gain share across the period, so growth is not distributed evenly between regions.
Behind these figures sit five regions, four component lines and five segmentation axes, each reported for every year from 2020 to 2034. The headline 2025 value is a triangulation of published figures and category proxies, short of a directly sourced total, and the same applies to the segment, regional and country breakdowns drawn from it.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- A forecast-period rate of 8.71% takes the market from USD 26 billion in 2025 to USD 55 billion in 2034, against 10.9% recorded over the 2020-2025 historical period.
- Outsourced Coding Services is the largest component line at USD 13.52 billion in 2025, a 52% share, reaching USD 24.2 billion and 44% of revenue by 2034.
- Fastest growth on the component axis belongs to Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions: 12.18% a year, USD 7.8 billion to USD 22 billion, and a share moving from 30% to 40%.
- Scenario range for 2034 runs from USD 49.5 billion in the bear case to USD 60.5 billion in the bull case, against a base-case USD 55 billion, the spread a plan built on this forecast has to absorb.
- The largest region is North America, generating USD 11.96 billion in 2025 (46% of the global total) and USD 23.1 billion by 2034, ahead of Asia Pacific at 24%.
- 85.03% of North America's base-year revenue comes from the United States alone: USD 10.17 billion in 2025, rising to USD 19.4 billion by 2034, which is why it is that region's worked example.
- The study covers 2020 through 2034 with 2025 as the base year, reporting five regions and five segmentation axes separately, with revenue, share and a growth rate for every line in each year.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By Component
Base year 2025Outsourced Coding Services leads with 52.0% of component segment revenue.
Share of component segment revenue, most recent base year.
Three things move over 2026-2034, and they are worth separating: the component mix, the regional balance, and the 8.71% compounding underneath both.
The direction of the market is not in question in any of the three. Each line and each region grows in revenue terms; what separates them is which takes the larger part of the growth.
Composition shifts on the component axis. The widest spread on the component axis is between Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions at 12.18% and Coding Training and Certification Services at 6.51%. Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions takes its share of revenue from 30% to 40% while Coding Training and Certification Services gives up ground, from 6% to 5%. The revenue figures behind that are USD 7.8 billion to USD 22 billion and USD 1.56 billion to USD 2.75 billion. Both expand; where a supplier sits on the axis still decides whether it tracks the market.
The regional balance moves. Asia Pacific moves from 24% of revenue in 2025 to 28% in 2034, worth USD 6.24 billion rising to USD 15.4 billion; Latin America moves from 5% of revenue in 2025 to 5.5% in 2034, worth USD 1.3 billion rising to USD 3.03 billion; Middle East and Africa moves from 4% of revenue in 2025 to 4.5% in 2034, worth USD 1.04 billion rising to USD 2.48 billion. The remaining regions grow in absolute terms while giving up share: North America at 46% moving to 42%, Europe at 21% moving to 20%. Growth is therefore not something a participant inherits from the market; it depends on which regions its revenue is weighted toward.
A continuation, not an inflection. Reading the series: USD 15.5 billion in 2020, USD 24.2 billion in 2024, USD 26 billion in 2025, USD 28.2 billion in 2026, USD 39.6 billion in 2030 and USD 55 billion in 2034. There is no discontinuity to time, and 8.71% forecast growth against 10.9% historical means the trend continues and does not turn. A plan built on this market is therefore a plan about capturing a share of steady expansion, which is decided on the component and regional axes, not by the headline rate.
Market Growth Factors
Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions adds the most incremental growth
At 12.18% against a market rate of 8.71%, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions is the line pulling the average up: USD 7.8 billion to USD 22 billion, and 30% of revenue to 40%. Set against 6.51% at the other end of the axis, this is the line that decides whether the market's 8.71% holds. That makes position on the component axis a growth decision, not a product one.
- 02The two largest regions hold most of the base
The largest regional base is North America: USD 11.96 billion in 2025 at 46% of the global total, USD 23.1 billion by 2034, still 42%. Asia Pacific adds a further 24% at USD 6.24 billion, reaching USD 15.4 billion. Together the two account for the majority of both the 2025 base and the revenue added by 2034, which is why a regional plan treating all five regions at equal weight misreads where the growth actually lands.
- 03Fifteen years of unbroken growth underpin the forecast
Revenue rose through USD 15.5 billion in 2020, USD 24.2 billion in 2024 and USD 26 billion in 2025, a compound 10.9% across the historical period. The forecast period then runs at 8.71%, ending 2034 at USD 55 billion. Fifteen years of unbroken growth in the series means the forecast rests on a demonstrated trajectory, not a projected turnaround, and it is why the 8.71% rate is applied flat across the whole period instead of ramped through it.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rising healthcare claim volumes and utilization growth | High | +9.5 | High | High | High |
| 2 | Expansion of AI-assisted and computer-assisted coding adoption | High | +8 | Medium | High | High |
| 3 | Growth of outsourced and offshore revenue-cycle coding services | Medium-High | +6 | High | Medium | Medium |
| 4 | Regulatory complexity and code-set transition requirements | Medium | +4 | Medium | Medium | High |
| 5 | Expansion of value-based care and risk-adjustment coding needs | Medium | +3 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 6 | Other emerging demand factors | Low | +1.5 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +32 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coding labor shortages and rising wage costs | Medium | −1.8 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| 2 | Data privacy and security constraints on offshore delivery | Medium | −1.2 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Total | −3 | |||||
Drivers contribute 32 Billion and restraints remove 3 Billion, a net 29 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
The 8.71% forecast rate rests on three things that can be measured separately: the size of the existing base, the mix shift on the component axis, and where regional growth is concentrated.
Restraining Factors
The bear case and what drives it
Market Restraints
2- 01The bear case and what drives it
The study's downside path assumes the bear case assumes hospital and payer budgets tighten enough to slow outsourced coding volume growth, code-set transition costs absorb spending that would otherwise go toward new coding capacity, and wage inflation in key offshore delivery markets compresses vendor margins and pricing flexibility, and ends 2034 at USD 49.5 billion against the USD 55 billion base case, the same USD 26 billion base year, a slower forecast period.
- 02Outsourced Coding Services holds the blended rate down
Outsourced Coding Services carries 52% of 2025 revenue at USD 13.52 billion but compounds at 6.7% against 8.71% for the market, taking its share to 44% by 2034 even as revenue rises to USD 24.2 billion. Because it carries that much of the base, its pace holds the blended rate down more than any faster line lifts it.
Market Opportunities
Upside case: USD 60.5 billion by 2034
Market Opportunities
2- 01Upside case: USD 60.5 billion by 2034
The upside path assumes the bull case assumes computer-assisted coding adoption accelerates faster than the base case, claim volumes hold up across all major buyer markets, and nearshore and offshore delivery capacity expands without disruption. It ends 2034 at USD 60.5 billion against a USD 55 billion base case, off the same USD 26 billion base year.
- 02Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions is where share changes hands
Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions grows at 12.18% against 8.71% for the market, adding revenue from USD 7.8 billion in 2025 to USD 22 billion in 2034 and taking its share from 30% to 40%. It is the place on this axis where share changes hands at scale, so it is where an entrant can take position without displacing the incumbent in Outsourced Coding Services.
Market Challenges
Concentration on the component axis
Market Challenges
2- 01Concentration on the component axis
With 52% of 2025 revenue and 44% of 2034 revenue (USD 13.52 billion rising to USD 24.2 billion) Outsourced Coding Services is where the market's exposure sits. A market leaning this heavily on one component line concentrates its exposure there, and a shift in demand for that line moves the total more than any other single change on the axis.
- 02The United States is 85.03% of North America
Of North America's USD 11.96 billion in 2025, USD 10.17 billion (85.03%) comes from the United States alone, rising to USD 19.4 billion by 2034. A regional number that depends this heavily on one country carries that country's specific conditions inside it, which a reader treating the region as diversified would miss.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesfive segmentation axes are reported; by component, by classification system, deployment mode, end user and specialty/application. Revenue does not add across them: each is a different cut of the same total.
All four component lines expand in revenue terms over the forecast period. Share is the dividing line; one takes it, the others cede it.
By Component · 4 segments
By Component
- Largest Outsourced Coding Services · 52%
- Fastest Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions · 12.2%
- Moves most Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions · +10 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outsourced Coding Services | $13.52B | 52% | $24.20B | 44%-8 | 6.7% |
| Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions | $7.80B | 30% | $22B | 40%+10 | 12.2% |
| Coding Audit and Compliance Services | $3.12B | 12% | $6.05B | 11%-1 | 7.7% |
| Coding Training and Certification Services | $1.56B | 6% | $2.75B | 5%-1 | 6.5% |
Scale in Outsourced Coding Services and Growth in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions Define the Component Axis Outsourced coding services lead because they offer providers established vendor relationships, predictable per-claim pricing and a proven accuracy track record without requiring large upfront technology investment. Software and computer-assisted coding solutions grow fastest as natural language processing matures, reducing turnaround time and labor dependency, and as providers seek to bring more coding in-house once automation reliably matches outsourced accuracy. Outsourced Coding Services remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Classification System · 4 segments
Scale in ICD-10-CM and Growth in Other Classification Systems (ICD-11 and DRG) Define the Classification system Axis
- Largest ICD-10-CM · 42%
- Fastest Other Classification Systems (ICD-11 and DRG) · 14.5%
- Moves most ICD-10-CM · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICD-10-CM | $10.92B | 42% | $20.90B | 38%-4 | 7.5% |
| CPT | $9.88B | 38% | $21.45B | 39%+1 | 9% |
| HCPCS Level II | $3.90B | 15% | $8.25B | 15% | 8.7% |
| Other Classification Systems (ICD-11 and DRG) | $1.30B | 5% | $4.40B | 8%+3 | 14.5% |
CPT and ICD-10-CM lead because they are the mandatory code sets underlying the overwhelming majority of outpatient and inpatient claims across mature healthcare systems, making them unavoidable for any provider seeking reimbursement. The emerging classification category grows fastest as regulators pilot newer standards and providers begin building compliance capacity ahead of eventual mandates. By 2034 the largest line is CPT and no longer ICD-10-CM, the one axis here where the order actually changes.
By Deployment Mode · 3 segments
Nearshore Outpaces the Axis While Offshore Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Offshore · 48%
- Fastest Nearshore · 13.7%
- Moves most Nearshore · +6 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore | $12.48B | 48% | $25.30B | 46%-2 | 8.2% |
| Onshore | $10.40B | 40% | $19.80B | 36%-4 | 7.4% |
| Nearshore | $3.12B | 12% | $9.90B | 18%+6 | 13.7% |
Offshore delivery leads because labor cost arbitrage remains the strongest lever available to providers facing sustained margin pressure on coding and billing operations. Nearshore delivery grows fastest as health systems weigh data residency requirements, time zone alignment and faster query resolution against pure cost savings, favoring vendors who can shorten turnaround without giving up much of the price advantage. The order does not change: Offshore is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds.
By End User · 5 segments
Ambulatory Surgical Centers Outpaces the Axis While Hospitals Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Hospitals · 38%
- Fastest Ambulatory Surgical Centers · 11.4%
- Moves most Hospitals · -3 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitals | $9.88B | 38% | $19.25B | 35%-3 | 7.7% |
| Physician Practices and Clinics | $7.02B | 27% | $14.30B | 26%-1 | 8.2% |
| Diagnostic and Imaging Centers | $3.90B | 15% | $8.80B | 16%+1 | 9.5% |
| Payers and Health Insurance Companies | $3.12B | 12% | $7.15B | 13%+1 | 9.7% |
| Ambulatory Surgical Centers | $2.08B | 8% | $5.50B | 10%+2 | 11.4% |
Hospitals lead because they generate the highest claim volume and the greatest coding complexity across combined inpatient and outpatient service lines. Ambulatory surgical centers grow fastest as procedure volume continues shifting toward lower-cost outpatient settings, and these centers depend heavily on accurate coding to secure reimbursement for increasingly complex same-day surgical procedures. By 2034 Hospitals is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
By Specialty/application · 5 segments
Oncology Outpaces the Axis While General and Primary Care Holds the Largest Share
- Largest General and Primary Care · 30%
- Fastest Oncology · 11.6%
- Moves most General and Primary Care · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General and Primary Care | $7.80B | 30% | $14.30B | 26%-4 | 7% |
| Radiology | $5.20B | 20% | $11B | 20% | 8.7% |
| Cardiology | $4.68B | 18% | $9.35B | 17%-1 | 8% |
| Oncology | $3.90B | 15% | $10.45B | 19%+4 | 11.6% |
| Other Specialties | $4.42B | 17% | $9.90B | 18%+1 | 9.4% |
General and primary care leads on sheer claim volume generated by routine visits across every healthcare system. Oncology grows fastest as treatment regimens become more complex, combination therapies and staging requirements expand the coding work involved, and payers scrutinize these claims more closely, raising the value of specialty-trained coding expertise. By 2034 General and Primary Care is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered, and the one giving up the most — 4 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.9×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 46%
- By 2034 42%
- Revenue $11.96B → $23.10B
46% of the global medical coding market sits in North America in 2025, worth USD 11.96 billion with USD 23.1 billion projected for 2034. By revenue it sits first across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
Its share moves to 42% by 2034, and the region keeps growing in absolute terms while others expand faster, a change in relative weight, not a decline in demand.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Outsourced Coding Services largest at 52% of 2025 revenue, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions fastest at 12.18%. Per-axis and per-country detail for North America sits in the full report.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 85% of it, growing 1.9×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 85%
- Of global 39.1%
- Revenue $10.17B → $19.40B
The largest single market in North America is the United States, at USD 10.17 billion in 2025 and USD 19.4 billion in 2034. At 85.03% of regional revenue in the base year it is not one market among several, the region's trajectory is largely this country's trajectory. Against regional totals of USD 11.96 billion in 2025 and USD 23.1 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Demand in the United States follows the component mix reported at global level: Outsourced Coding Services is the largest line at 52% of 2025 revenue, moving to 44% by 2034, while Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions grows fastest at 12.18% and takes its share from 30% to 40%. Its 85.03% weight in North America means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. Per-component revenue for the United States appears on its own in the full report.
Medical coding in the United States operates within the framework set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which mandates use of standardized code sets such as ICD-CM, ICD-PCS, and HCPCS for claims submitted to federal health programs. Coding software and services that form part of certified electronic health record technology must pass testing under the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology's certification program, demonstrating interoperability and data-exchange capability. Any vendor handling protected health information must implement the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards required under HIPAA's Privacy and Security Rules. Accuracy of code assignment is enforced through payer audits and reimbursement-integrity compliance programs, independent of any premarket device approval process.
Competition in the United States is decided on the component axis rather than on geography, since suppliers here sell into the same component lines reported globally. The commercially relevant division is 52% of 2025 revenue in Outsourced Coding Services, where the volume is, against 12.18% growth in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, where share moves. The full report covers country-level positioning and shares company by company; this summary does not.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 1.9×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 12%
- Of global 5.5%
- Revenue $1.44B → $2.77B
Canada is sized at USD 1.44 billion in 2025, rising to USD 2.77 billion by 2034; 5.54% of global revenue and 12.04% of North America. It is reported separately from the United States across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Europe Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered — 1 point of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.0×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 21%
- By 2034 20%
- Revenue $5.46B → $11B
21% of the global medical coding market sits in Europe in 2025, worth USD 5.46 billion and reaches USD 11 billion by 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, third by revenue throughout the period.
Share settles at 20% in 2034, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Outsourced Coding Services largest at 52% of 2025 revenue, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions fastest at 12.18%. Europe is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
Germany
The largest market in Europe, growing 1.9×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 28%
- Of global 5.9%
- Revenue $1.53B → $2.97B
Germany is the largest market within Europe, generating USD 1.53 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 2.97 billion by 2034. It accounts for 28.02% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Regional revenue of USD 5.46 billion in 2025 and USD 11 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is Outsourced Coding Services at 52% of 2025 revenue, easing to 44% by 2034, and the fastest is Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions at 12.18%, from 30% to 40%. With 28.02% of Europe concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. Germany carries its own component breakdown in the full report.
In Germany, medical coding follows classification systems maintained by the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, which issues the German modification of the International Classification of Diseases and the national procedure classification used for hospital billing. Software that assigns or supports these codes must process patient data under the General Data Protection Regulation and the Federal Data Protection Act, observing data minimisation and purpose limitation for clinical records. A coding tool that also performs clinical decision-support functions influencing diagnosis or treatment may fall within the EU Medical Device Regulation and require a conformity assessment before sale. Purely administrative coding and billing functions stay outside that regime, governed instead by data protection rules and the billing standards set by the statutory health insurance system.
Supplier positions in Germany sit on the component axis: the country buys the same lines the global market does, in the same order. Outsourced Coding Services, at 52% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, growing at 12.18%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. The commercial size of that position is USD 5.46 billion in 2025 and USD 11 billion by 2034, 21% of the global total in the base year.
United Kingdom
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 1.9×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 24%
- Of global 5%
- Revenue $1.31B → $2.53B
Within Europe, the United Kingdom accounts for 23.99% of regional revenue and 5.04% of the global total, worth USD 1.31 billion in 2025 and USD 2.53 billion by 2034.
France
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 2.0×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15.9%
- Of global 3.4%
- Revenue $0.87B → $1.76B
Within Europe, France accounts for 15.93% of regional revenue and 3.35% of the global total, worth USD 0.87 billion in 2025 and USD 1.76 billion by 2034.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered — it picks up 4 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.5×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 24%
- By 2034 28%
- Revenue $6.24B → $15.40B
USD 6.24 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Asia Pacific, 24% of the global medical coding market and reaches USD 15.4 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks second by revenue in both years.
Its share rises to 28% over the forecast period, so the region grows faster than the market's 8.71% and takes a larger part of the revenue added by 2034 than its 2025 weight implies.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Outsourced Coding Services largest at 52% of 2025 revenue, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions fastest at 12.18%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Asia Pacific sits in the full report.
India
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 2.6×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 30%
- Of global 7.2%
- Revenue $1.87B → $4.93B
India is the largest market within Asia Pacific, generating USD 1.87 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 4.93 billion by 2034. At 29.97% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Asia Pacific's revenue is generated in other markets. Set against USD 6.24 billion and USD 15.4 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
The component pattern in India is the global one: 52% of 2025 revenue in Outsourced Coding Services, 44% by 2034, against 12.18% growth in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions taking it from 30% to 40%. With 29.97% of Asia Pacific concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. The full report reports India by component separately.
Medical coding in India is shaped less by a single device regulator than by data-protection and health-information standards. Coding software that stores or transmits patient records must comply with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act and the Information Technology Act's rules on reasonable security practices for sensitive personal data. The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission sets interoperability and data-exchange standards that coding and billing systems used within public health programmes are expected to follow, including alignment with international disease classification systems adopted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Coding software itself is not treated as a medical device by the Central Drugs Standards Control Organisation unless it directly drives diagnostic or treatment decisions, in which case software-as-a-medical-device requirements would apply.
What separates suppliers in India is where they sit on the component axis, not which country they serve. The commercially relevant division is 52% of 2025 revenue in Outsourced Coding Services, where the volume is, against 12.18% growth in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, where share moves. The commercial size of that position is USD 6.24 billion in 2025 and USD 15.4 billion by 2034, 24% of the global total in the base year.
Japan
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.2×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 22%
- Of global 5.3%
- Revenue $1.37B → $3.08B
5.27% of global revenue is generated in Japan; USD 1.37 billion in 2025, reaching USD 3.08 billion in 2034, and 21.96% of Asia Pacific.
China
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.6×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 20%
- Of global 4.8%
- Revenue $1.25B → $3.23B
China is sized at USD 1.25 billion in 2025, rising to USD 3.23 billion by 2034; 4.81% of global revenue and 20.03% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from India across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.5 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.3×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 5%
- By 2034 5.5%
- Revenue $1.30B → $3.03B
In Latin America, 5% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 1.3 billion on the way to USD 3.03 billion by 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fourth by revenue throughout the period.
By 2034 the share has moved up to 5.5%, because it outgrows the market's 8.71%; the revenue added here is disproportionate to where the region started.
Within the region the component split tracks the global one; 52% of 2025 revenue in Outsourced Coding Services, fastest growth of 12.18% in Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions. Revenue for Latin America is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 2.3×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 50%
- Of global 2.5%
- Revenue $0.65B → $1.52B
50% of Latin America's base-year revenue comes from Brazil; USD 0.65 billion, rising to USD 1.52 billion by 2034. It accounts for 50% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Set against USD 1.3 billion and USD 3.03 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is Outsourced Coding Services at 52% of 2025 revenue, easing to 44% by 2034, and the fastest is Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions at 12.18%, from 30% to 40%. With 50% of Latin America concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. The full report reports Brazil by component separately.
In Brazil, medical coding for hospital and insurance billing is built around the Classificação Internacional de Doenças as adopted and administered through the Ministério da Saúde and its DATASUS data systems, which set the coding tables used for reporting to the public health system. Suppliers of coding software must comply with the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados when processing patient records, applying consent, purpose limitation, and security safeguards to clinical information. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária regulates software only where it qualifies as a medical device performing diagnostic or therapeutic functions, so standalone coding and billing tools generally fall outside its device-approval pathway. Private insurers additionally require conformity with coding tables set by the Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar for claims to be accepted.
Supplier positions in Brazil sit on the component axis: the country buys the same lines the global market does, in the same order. Outsourced Coding Services, at 52% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, growing at 12.18%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. The commercial size of that position is USD 1.3 billion in 2025, moving to USD 3.03 billion by 2034 across the forecast period.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 2.3×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 30%
- Of global 1.5%
- Revenue $0.39B → $0.91B
Mexico is sized at USD 0.39 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.91 billion by 2034; 1.5% of global revenue and 30% of Latin America. It is reported separately from Brazil across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.5 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.4×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 4%
- By 2034 4.5%
- Revenue $1.04B → $2.48B
4% of the global medical coding market sits in Middle East and Africa in 2025, worth USD 1.04 billion and reaches USD 2.48 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits fifth across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
Share climbs to 4.5% by 2034, on growth above the market's own 8.71%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
Outsourced Coding Services leads here as it does globally, at 52% of 2025 revenue, and Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions again grows fastest at 12.18%. Revenue for Middle East and Africa is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Saudi Arabia
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.4×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 34.6%
- Of global 1.4%
- Revenue $0.36B → $0.87B
Saudi Arabia is the largest market within Middle East and Africa, generating USD 0.36 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 0.87 billion by 2034. At 34.62% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated in other markets. Against regional totals of USD 1.04 billion in 2025 and USD 2.48 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Saudi Arabia buys along the same lines as the market globally; Outsourced Coding Services first at 52% of 2025 revenue and 44% in 2034, Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions fastest at 12.18% on a share moving from 30% to 40%. With 34.62% of Middle East and Africa concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. The full report reports Saudi Arabia by component separately.
Healthcare coding in Saudi Arabia is governed primarily through the National Platform for Health Information Exchange Standards operated under the Council of Health Insurance and the Ministry of Health, which mandates standardised disease and procedure coding for insurance claims and clinical data exchange. Coding software connecting to this platform must meet defined interoperability and data-format requirements before providers and insurers can submit claims through it. Any processing of patient data is additionally subject to the Personal Data Protection Law administered by the Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority, which sets consent and security obligations for health information. The Saudi Food and Drug Authority's medical device framework applies only where coding software performs a diagnostic or treatment function, leaving administrative coding tools outside that particular approval route.
What separates suppliers in Saudi Arabia is where they sit on the component axis, not which country they serve. Outsourced Coding Services, at 52% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, growing at 12.18%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. The commercial size of that position is USD 1.04 billion in 2025, moving to USD 2.48 billion by 2034 across the forecast period.
United Arab Emirates
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.4×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 25%
- Of global 1%
- Revenue $0.26B → $0.62B
The United Arab Emirates is sized at USD 0.26 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.62 billion by 2034; 1% of global revenue and 25% of Middle East and Africa. It is reported separately from Saudi Arabia across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Component, Classification System, Deployment Mode, End User, Specialty/Application, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Position on the Component Axis Decides Competitive Standing
The component axis, not the regional one, is where competition happens. Outsourced Coding Services is 52% of 2025 revenue at USD 13.52 billion and still 44% in 2034, so it is where the volume sits and where an incumbent's position is hardest to move. Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions, compounding at 12.18% against 6.51% for Coding Training and Certification Services, is where share changes hands over the forecast period. Holding the first and taking the second are separate capabilities, which is why a market of USD 26 billion supports as many suppliers as it does.
In medical coding, suppliers are separated by certified coder headcount and specialty depth, since accurate oncology, cardiology or orthopedic coding requires training that generalist staff often lack. Investment in computer-assisted coding and natural language processing technology increasingly determines turnaround speed and consistency, favoring vendors able to fund ongoing model development. Compliance and audit-readiness track record, breadth of hospital-system relationships and the scale of onshore, nearshore and offshore delivery networks round out the field. The largest vendors compete on integrated revenue-cycle platforms and delivery scale; smaller and regional vendors compete on specialty-specific accuracy and closer client service.
Presence matters unevenly by region. With 46% of 2025 revenue in North America and 24% in Asia Pacific, a supplier's coverage of those two decides most of its addressable base before any product question arises.
Company-level profiles, financials, shares and development histories are held in the full report and not in this summary.
List of Key Medical Coding Market Companies Profiled
12 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- R1 RCM(United States)
- Optum360 (UnitedHealth Group)(United States)
- AGS Health(United States)
- Access Healthcare(United States)
- Omega Healthcare(United States)
- GeBBS Healthcare Solutions(United States)
- Ventra Health(United States)
- Conifer Health Solutions(United States)
- Vee Technologies(United States)
- 3M Health Information Systems (Solventum)(United States)
- Datavant(United States)
- MRO Corp(United States)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Component, Classification System, Deployment Mode, End User, Specialty/application), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 12 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Medical Coding Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Medical Coding Market Overview, By Component, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Medical Coding Market Overview, By Classification System, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Medical Coding Market Overview, By Deployment Mode, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Medical Coding Market Overview, By End User, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Medical Coding Market Overview, By Specialty/application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Medical Coding Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Medical Coding Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Medical Coding Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Medical Coding Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Medical Coding Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Medical Coding Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Medical Coding Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Component
4- 01Outsourced Coding Services
- 02Coding Software & Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) Solutions
- 03Coding Audit and Compliance Services
- 04Coding Training and Certification Services
By Classification System
4- 01ICD-10-CM
- 02CPT
- 03HCPCS Level II
- 04Other Classification Systems (ICD-11 and DRG)
By Deployment Mode
3- 01Offshore
- 02Onshore
- 03Nearshore
By End User
5- 01Hospitals
- 02Physician Practices and Clinics
- 03Diagnostic and Imaging Centers
- 04Payers and Health Insurance Companies
- 05Ambulatory Surgical Centers
By Specialty/application
5- 01General and Primary Care
- 02Radiology
- 03Cardiology
- 04Oncology
- 05Other Specialties
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by Component. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
The market was sized bottom-up from encounter and claim volumes, including hospital discharge counts and outpatient visit counts by CPT category, multiplied by the coding fees or per-claim and per-FTE rates that service providers and software vendors realize for onshore, nearshore and offshore delivery. This build was then checked against disclosed revenue and margin figures from major revenue-cycle-management and coding-services companies. Where the two diverged, the volume or realized-price assumption in the bottom-up build was corrected rather than averaging the two figures together. Key inputs include hospital discharge and outpatient visit statistics, CPT and ICD-10-CM code volume estimates, and vendor pricing benchmarks specific to each delivery mode.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Interviews target revenue-cycle-management directors, coding compliance officers, outsourcing procurement leads and health-information-management department heads at hospitals, physician groups and payers, since these roles set vendor selection, coding volume commitments and pricing terms. Sampling also reaches commercial leaders at coding-services and computer-assisted-coding software vendors, who explain contract structures, seat-based versus volume-based pricing and delivery-location mix. Geographic emphasis follows the market's own delivery structure: the United States and Canada for buyer-side demand, India and the Philippines for offshore delivery capacity, and Western Europe for regulatory and reimbursement context, so the sample reflects both where coding budgets are spent and where the work is performed.
Desk research draws on CMS claims and hospital utilization data, the American Medical Association's CPT code set updates, the World Health Organization's ICD-11 implementation timeline, hospital discharge registries published by national health statistics agencies, and public filings from listed revenue-cycle-management and health-information companies. Offshore delivery volumes are checked against IT and business-process-outsourcing export data published by India's NASSCOM and the IT and Business Process Association of the Philippines, both of which track healthcare-specific outsourcing revenue apart from broader outsourcing totals.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from projected growth in claim and encounter volumes, the pace at which computer-assisted coding displaces manual outsourced coding hours, and the rate at which coding budgets shift toward nearshore delivery as data residency requirements tighten. It adjusts for the temporary coding backlog created by pandemic-era staffing shortages, which inflated outsourced coding volumes in the earliest historical years and would otherwise distort the trend line. Holding this forecast requires continued claim volume growth, no abrupt reversal of offshoring policy in major buyer markets, and computer-assisted coding accuracy improving enough to sustain provider confidence in reduced manual review.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Historical years were checked against recorded claim volume growth and reported revenue growth at major coding-services and revenue-cycle-management vendors, confirming the estimated series tracks actual outcomes rather than a smoothed trend. Segment share shifts, particularly the move toward computer-assisted coding and nearshore delivery, were reviewed against vendor commentary on delivery-location mix and technology adoption. Sensitivities were tested on the pace of code-set transition and on offshore-delivery growth, since both are the assumptions most likely to move the outer forecast years if adoption runs faster or slower than assumed.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmest for the deployment-mode and end-user splits, where offshore delivery volumes and hospital claim data are both independently reported and consistent with each other. It is weaker for the classification-system split, since ICD-11 adoption timing varies by country and code-set-specific coding volume is thinly reported outside the United States. The main structural risk is a faster or slower shift of coding work from manual outsourced services to computer-assisted software, which would redistribute revenue across components without necessarily changing the total size of the market.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Medical Coding Market projected to reach?
USD 55 Billion by 2034, CAGR 8.71%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 46% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
Outsourced Coding Services is the largest line by Component, at 52% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
R1 RCM, Optum360 (UnitedHealth Group), AGS Health, Access Healthcare, Omega Healthcare, GeBBS Healthcare Solutions, Ventra Health, Conifer Health Solutions, Vee Technologies, 3M Health Information Systems (Solventum), Datavant, MRO Corp. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.